From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E18C2D0BF for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 11:02:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A542464D for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 11:02:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729096AbfLELCd convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Dec 2019 06:02:33 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.134]:50379 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728735AbfLELCc (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Dec 2019 06:02:32 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f174.google.com ([209.85.208.174]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue010 [212.227.15.129]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MPXta-1iQ7JE2e7G-00MgIi; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 12:02:30 +0100 Received: by mail-lj1-f174.google.com with SMTP id u17so3056978lja.4; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 03:02:30 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUWH4PIwe+QeMJCxB97OoyKVGYHnrc7jhjqo7gUJsTeALTl8qvy /3Y06Y0EmlLC9Eql0rTMdMA2Ac5Wh2bPQkPBjjU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzDYON/MBaEaa/M6IrL+iOGcm4xJQW0wdjdRvYG7K2lgdB2YeKajZPfIsCsDNe/lygpM40sVli0MtDQSfWZsds= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:2e14:: with SMTP id u20mr5178646lju.120.1575543750059; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 03:02:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190621095252.32307-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> <20190621095252.32307-17-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> <20191204135159.GA7210@roeck-us.net> <6cdf4734-4065-09c1-8623-1bf523b38c1b@arm.com> <20191204161641.GA28130@roeck-us.net> In-Reply-To: From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 12:02:13 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 16/25] arm: Add support for generic vDSO (causing crash) To: Vincenzo Frascino Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu=2DDaud=C3=A9?= , Guenter Roeck , linux-arch , Linux ARM , open list , "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Russell King , Ralf Baechle , Paul Burton , Daniel Lezcano , Thomas Gleixner , Mark Salyzyn , Peter Collingbourne , Shuah Khan , Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>, Rasmus Villemoes , Huw Davies , Shijith Thotton , Andre Przywara Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Zn6CTbUEtRHLVAE3XDUBZa9tw1grzZNZ4Bh11aTqhSKPcCdLqF2 duGWHTlB04bQu3q15eEAeoZP4GhzUriW8J1D+AdQ+zOqS5UyBx1bqTZGaKzHPEPgkXjbAyU CTy8fiZ/m/k7n/7nEgL2jt968G+3lPSL53Jy/CjBY8T4aiqPyk7HfSJDhMWJJ8LnEWlqvJV +xtzv92vRjVv/6dYh2K4Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Jh9jVCiv6Mk=:6IeZP/z8O/nZnV8dRQ5XQB jzHZggG1fhaUDD154kEgWcyZdMUcQ026S7t+wTqree211w/ALcwlOIk3gI67xPWilkIuMjzns VLy7os+VYu6ZlNAonP8g5iZDtHHgKCfVpyETZMV6WIinRz79HdC+qFXus5JtBSE5m9JoV33Ho ErSeXTRLs6x5lYkhconpSUA41dKMqwFuj952axq7FcyTV3AxS++nlK9A4F7RiMHnFzNsU0OXO MRuQ/YIbxZtzLdRPb91dK1M42Xa47JkYYgXcXsLK6N7Db5IcKqwy/GUhuwK/Fjt/o43wa/LEa dwx+5SunGarp1fqwLJYS85PCkTYfc97MG8yGmVxFqKkS+eBo4yy1NcT2Bjohyjzyp51R8ZoPt CAsFbSDnEpFhzWKUQecbiQWsCRo8Zyr6nCbvoJlcH4YEL/imaSmx+Q5D9Alu/DNbDFU5dsQgc 4ZV75Sx3OpZGy3O9Bj7BVsvFUeS8VUi7FfdwnP5K7FoHD4xK0DH99eA/3ZZ5tvQCsHI6zmuLf z+L2wZmRyTqzGXvX0z/wHcwYdCfk8Gvy2HFIsPeUMpXdouGF8zDryxHa0qg9QiATuNBMYNpG1 Srg6IcRe+1eoF7WJK9MEHWWNXdeuj+X4WqTMyxMdniCS7/aodfZ0ajNIN2CvcTTRK9iRRbGP/ qpqOCx6RgIucC4g1o2YuSqshk0PpppB96RtzVIa/+YOosWzOuddzcl+kjH2AaG0W+L0wYnr8R SEYa+S5jlVo47BiTkWB2rpbftH4i8DmSYwK3AfPntheqYfjizi5WWqTQth0B7VRoYI+DeteyF hW7puGorAICBgp17bRl30A9HLYD1wU8Z7xiW52UsvmM3E4bYyyWgVnkcUzgkXHw0ElfUQonNR Enscj6COPtJvinEeGS2g== Sender: linux-mips-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 11:00 AM Vincenzo Frascino wrote: > > Hi Philippe, > > On 05/12/2019 09:42, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > > There are only 2 "Investigated-by" vs 7k+ "Suggested-by"... Is there a > > real difference? > > Not sure about that. My take is that Suggested-by is used when someone suggests > you how to possibly implement a feature and you go and do that. Investigated-by > is when there is a fix to make and someone comes to you with the exact solution > like in this case Arnd did. It's not a standard tag, but I suggested it because it does explain better what I did. You could also just explain in clear text that I did the analysis and then add the more normal Suggested-by tag, I don't care either way. Arnd