From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
arnd@arndb.de, tglx@linutronix.de, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com,
luto@kernel.org, Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Surprising code generated for vdso_read_begin()
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:52:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bd4557a7-9715-59aa-5d8e-488c5e516a98@c-s.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1577111363.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Wondering why we get something so complicated/redundant for
vdso_read_begin() <include/vdso/helpers.h>
static __always_inline u32 vdso_read_begin(const struct vdso_data *vd)
{
u32 seq;
while ((seq = READ_ONCE(vd->seq)) & 1)
cpu_relax();
smp_rmb();
return seq;
}
6e0: 81 05 00 f0 lwz r8,240(r5)
6e4: 71 09 00 01 andi. r9,r8,1
6e8: 41 82 00 10 beq 6f8 <__c_kernel_clock_gettime+0x158>
6ec: 81 05 00 f0 lwz r8,240(r5)
6f0: 71 0a 00 01 andi. r10,r8,1
6f4: 40 82 ff f8 bne 6ec <__c_kernel_clock_gettime+0x14c>
6f8:
r5 being vd pointer
Why the first triplet, not only the second triplet ? Something wrong
with using READ_ONCE() for that ?
Christophe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-09 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-23 14:31 [RFC PATCH v2 00/10] powerpc/32: switch VDSO to C implementation Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/10] lib: vdso: ensure all arches have 32bit fallback Christophe Leroy
2019-12-24 2:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-01-10 20:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-10 21:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-30 12:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-02 11:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-09 15:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/10] lib: vdso: move call to fallback out of common code Christophe Leroy
2019-12-24 2:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 11:41 ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 12:09 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/10] lib: vdso: Change __cvdso_clock_gettime/getres_common() to __cvdso_clock_gettime/getres() Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/10] lib: vdso: get pointer to vdso data from the arch Christophe Leroy
2019-12-24 2:27 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 11:53 ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 12:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 12:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 14:46 ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/10] lib: vdso: inline do_hres() Christophe Leroy
2019-12-24 2:29 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-30 12:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-10 21:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-11 9:06 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/10] lib: vdso: make do_coarse() return 0 Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/10] lib: vdso: don't use READ_ONCE() in __c_kernel_time() Christophe Leroy
2019-12-24 1:58 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-24 11:12 ` christophe leroy
2019-12-24 12:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-01-10 21:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-11 8:05 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-11 11:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-01-13 6:52 ` Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/10] lib: vdso: Avoid duplication in __cvdso_clock_getres() Christophe Leroy
2019-12-24 1:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/10] powerpc/vdso32: inline __get_datapage() Christophe Leroy
2019-12-23 14:31 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/10] powerpc/32: Switch VDSO to C implementation Christophe Leroy
2020-01-09 17:52 ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2020-01-09 20:07 ` Surprising code generated for vdso_read_begin() Segher Boessenkool
2020-01-10 6:45 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-01-11 11:33 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-02-16 18:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-19 8:45 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-02-19 9:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-19 13:08 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bd4557a7-9715-59aa-5d8e-488c5e516a98@c-s.fr \
--to=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).