From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f200.google.com (mail-wr0-f200.google.com [209.85.128.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751B06B03B8 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 04:54:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr0-f200.google.com with SMTP id 77so10908817wrb.11 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 01:54:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wr0-x241.google.com (mail-wr0-x241.google.com. [2a00:1450:400c:c0c::241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 65si4470256wrc.166.2017.06.23.01.54.05 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 23 Jun 2017 01:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr0-x241.google.com with SMTP id k67so10844576wrc.1 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 01:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:54:02 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] x86: switch atomic.h to use atomic-instrumented.h Message-ID: <20170623085402.kfzu6sri6bwi2ppo@gmail.com> References: <20170622141411.6af8091132e4416e3635b62e@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Andrew Morton , Mark Rutland , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrey Ryabinin , kasan-dev , "x86@kernel.org" , LKML , "linux-mm@kvack.org" * Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Andrew Morton > wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:14:16 +0200 Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > > >> Add arch_ prefix to all atomic operations and include > >> . This will allow > >> to add KASAN instrumentation to all atomic ops. > > > > This gets a large number of (simple) rejects when applied to > > linux-next. Can you please redo against -next? > > > This is based on tip/locking tree. Ingo already took a part of these > series. The plan is that he takes the rest, and this applies on > tip/locking without conflicts. Yeah, so I've taken the rest as well, it all looks very clean now. Should show up in the next -next, if it passes my (arguably limited) testing. Andrew, is this workflow fine with you? You usually take KASAN patches, but I was unhappy with the atomics instrumention of the earlier patches, and ended up reviewing the followup variants, and felt that if I hinder a patchset I might as well test and apply it once I'm happy with them! ;-) Should be a special exception for this series only. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org