From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr0-f200.google.com (mail-wr0-f200.google.com [209.85.128.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06DC96B0279 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:00:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wr0-f200.google.com with SMTP id 23so8888851wry.4 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 12:00:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org. [140.211.169.12]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 76si4601372wmb.86.2017.06.23.12.00.52 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 23 Jun 2017 12:00:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 12:00:50 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] x86: switch atomic.h to use atomic-instrumented.h Message-Id: <20170623120050.a4703ec2e3125b13361228ee@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20170623085402.kfzu6sri6bwi2ppo@gmail.com> References: <20170622141411.6af8091132e4416e3635b62e@linux-foundation.org> <20170623085402.kfzu6sri6bwi2ppo@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Dmitry Vyukov , Mark Rutland , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Will Deacon , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrey Ryabinin , kasan-dev , "x86@kernel.org" , LKML , "linux-mm@kvack.org" On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:54:02 +0200 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Andrew Morton > > wrote: > > > On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:14:16 +0200 Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > > > > > >> Add arch_ prefix to all atomic operations and include > > >> . This will allow > > >> to add KASAN instrumentation to all atomic ops. > > > > > > This gets a large number of (simple) rejects when applied to > > > linux-next. Can you please redo against -next? > > > > > > This is based on tip/locking tree. Ingo already took a part of these > > series. The plan is that he takes the rest, and this applies on > > tip/locking without conflicts. > > Yeah, so I've taken the rest as well, it all looks very clean now. Should show up > in the next -next, if it passes my (arguably limited) testing. > > Andrew, is this workflow fine with you? You usually take KASAN patches, but I was > unhappy with the atomics instrumention of the earlier patches, and ended up > reviewing the followup variants, and felt that if I hinder a patchset I might as > well test and apply it once I'm happy with them! ;-) > Sure.. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org