linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm, memory_hotplug: try to migrate full pfn range
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 01:12:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181212011251.6wchg5kr2ngp5niq@master> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181211142741.2607-2-mhocko@kernel.org>

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 03:27:39PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>
>do_migrate_range has been limiting the number of pages to migrate to 256
>for some reason which is not documented. Even if the limit made some
>sense back then when it was introduced it doesn't really serve a good
>purpose these days. If the range contains huge pages then
>we break out of the loop too early and go through LRU and pcp
>caches draining and scan_movable_pages is quite suboptimal.
>
>The only reason to limit the number of pages I can think of is to reduce
>the potential time to react on the fatal signal. But even then the
>number of pages is a questionable metric because even a single page
>might migration block in a non-killable state (e.g. __unmap_and_move).
>
>Remove the limit and offline the full requested range (this is one
>membblock worth of pages with the current code). Should we ever get a

s/membblock/memblock/

Or memory block is more accurate? May memblock confuse audience with
lower level facility?

>report that offlining takes too long to react on fatal signal then we
>should rather fix the core migration to use killable waits and bailout
>on a signal.
>
>Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
>Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
>Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>---
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>index c82193db4be6..6263c8cd4491 100644
>--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>@@ -1339,18 +1339,16 @@ static struct page *new_node_page(struct page *page, unsigned long private)
> 	return new_page_nodemask(page, nid, &nmask);
> }
> 
>-#define NR_OFFLINE_AT_ONCE_PAGES	(256)
> static int
> do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> {
> 	unsigned long pfn;
> 	struct page *page;
>-	int move_pages = NR_OFFLINE_AT_ONCE_PAGES;
> 	int not_managed = 0;
> 	int ret = 0;
> 	LIST_HEAD(source);
> 
>-	for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn && move_pages > 0; pfn++) {
>+	for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++) {
> 		if (!pfn_valid(pfn))
> 			continue;
> 		page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>@@ -1362,8 +1360,7 @@ do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> 				ret = -EBUSY;
> 				break;
> 			}
>-			if (isolate_huge_page(page, &source))
>-				move_pages -= 1 << compound_order(head);
>+			isolate_huge_page(page, &source);
> 			continue;
> 		} else if (PageTransHuge(page))
> 			pfn = page_to_pfn(compound_head(page))
>@@ -1382,7 +1379,6 @@ do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> 		if (!ret) { /* Success */
> 			put_page(page);
> 			list_add_tail(&page->lru, &source);
>-			move_pages--;
> 			if (!__PageMovable(page))
> 				inc_node_page_state(page, NR_ISOLATED_ANON +
> 						    page_is_file_cache(page));
>-- 
>2.19.2

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-12  1:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-11 14:27 [PATCH 0/3] few memory offlining enhancements Michal Hocko
2018-12-11 14:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm, memory_hotplug: try to migrate full pfn range Michal Hocko
2018-12-12  1:12   ` Wei Yang [this message]
2018-12-11 14:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm, memory_hotplug: deobfuscate migration part of offlining Michal Hocko
2018-12-11 14:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm, fault_around: do not take a reference to a locked page Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181212011251.6wchg5kr2ngp5niq@master \
    --to=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).