linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@mellanox.com>,
	"Ben Skeggs" <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>,
	Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH 17/22] mm/hmm: Fix error flows in hmm_invalidate_range_start
Date: Mon,  1 Jul 2019 08:20:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190701062020.19239-18-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190701062020.19239-1-hch@lst.de>

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>

If the trylock on the hmm->mirrors_sem fails the function will return
without decrementing the notifiers that were previously incremented. Since
the caller will not call invalidate_range_end() on EAGAIN this will result
in notifiers becoming permanently incremented and deadlock.

If the sync_cpu_device_pagetables() required blocking the function will
not return EAGAIN even though the device continues to touch the
pages. This is a violation of the mmu notifier contract.

Switch, and rename, the ranges_lock to a spin lock so we can reliably
obtain it without blocking during error unwind.

The error unwind is necessary since the notifiers count must be held
incremented across the call to sync_cpu_device_pagetables() as we cannot
allow the range to become marked valid by a parallel
invalidate_start/end() pair while doing sync_cpu_device_pagetables().

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Philip Yang <Philip.Yang@amd.com>
---
 include/linux/hmm.h |  2 +-
 mm/hmm.c            | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/hmm.h b/include/linux/hmm.h
index bf013e965257..0fa8ea34ccef 100644
--- a/include/linux/hmm.h
+++ b/include/linux/hmm.h
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
 struct hmm {
 	struct mm_struct	*mm;
 	struct kref		kref;
-	struct mutex		lock;
+	spinlock_t		ranges_lock;
 	struct list_head	ranges;
 	struct list_head	mirrors;
 	struct mmu_notifier	mmu_notifier;
diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
index b224ea635a77..de35289df20d 100644
--- a/mm/hmm.c
+++ b/mm/hmm.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static struct hmm *hmm_get_or_create(struct mm_struct *mm)
 	init_rwsem(&hmm->mirrors_sem);
 	hmm->mmu_notifier.ops = NULL;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&hmm->ranges);
-	mutex_init(&hmm->lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&hmm->ranges_lock);
 	kref_init(&hmm->kref);
 	hmm->notifiers = 0;
 	hmm->mm = mm;
@@ -144,6 +144,25 @@ static void hmm_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn, struct mm_struct *mm)
 	hmm_put(hmm);
 }
 
+static void notifiers_decrement(struct hmm *hmm)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
+	hmm->notifiers--;
+	if (!hmm->notifiers) {
+		struct hmm_range *range;
+
+		list_for_each_entry(range, &hmm->ranges, list) {
+			if (range->valid)
+				continue;
+			range->valid = true;
+		}
+		wake_up_all(&hmm->wq);
+	}
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
+}
+
 static int hmm_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 			const struct mmu_notifier_range *nrange)
 {
@@ -151,6 +170,7 @@ static int hmm_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 	struct hmm_mirror *mirror;
 	struct hmm_update update;
 	struct hmm_range *range;
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (!kref_get_unless_zero(&hmm->kref))
@@ -161,12 +181,7 @@ static int hmm_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 	update.event = HMM_UPDATE_INVALIDATE;
 	update.blockable = mmu_notifier_range_blockable(nrange);
 
-	if (mmu_notifier_range_blockable(nrange))
-		mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
-	else if (!mutex_trylock(&hmm->lock)) {
-		ret = -EAGAIN;
-		goto out;
-	}
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
 	hmm->notifiers++;
 	list_for_each_entry(range, &hmm->ranges, list) {
 		if (update.end < range->start || update.start >= range->end)
@@ -174,7 +189,7 @@ static int hmm_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 
 		range->valid = false;
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
 
 	if (mmu_notifier_range_blockable(nrange))
 		down_read(&hmm->mirrors_sem);
@@ -182,16 +197,23 @@ static int hmm_invalidate_range_start(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 		ret = -EAGAIN;
 		goto out;
 	}
+
 	list_for_each_entry(mirror, &hmm->mirrors, list) {
-		int ret;
+		int rc;
 
-		ret = mirror->ops->sync_cpu_device_pagetables(mirror, &update);
-		if (!update.blockable && ret == -EAGAIN)
+		rc = mirror->ops->sync_cpu_device_pagetables(mirror, &update);
+		if (rc) {
+			if (WARN_ON(update.blockable || rc != -EAGAIN))
+				continue;
+			ret = -EAGAIN;
 			break;
+		}
 	}
 	up_read(&hmm->mirrors_sem);
 
 out:
+	if (ret)
+		notifiers_decrement(hmm);
 	hmm_put(hmm);
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -204,20 +226,7 @@ static void hmm_invalidate_range_end(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 	if (!kref_get_unless_zero(&hmm->kref))
 		return;
 
-	mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
-	hmm->notifiers--;
-	if (!hmm->notifiers) {
-		struct hmm_range *range;
-
-		list_for_each_entry(range, &hmm->ranges, list) {
-			if (range->valid)
-				continue;
-			range->valid = true;
-		}
-		wake_up_all(&hmm->wq);
-	}
-	mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock);
-
+	notifiers_decrement(hmm);
 	hmm_put(hmm);
 }
 
@@ -868,6 +877,7 @@ int hmm_range_register(struct hmm_range *range,
 {
 	unsigned long mask = ((1UL << page_shift) - 1UL);
 	struct hmm *hmm = mirror->hmm;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
 	range->valid = false;
 	range->hmm = NULL;
@@ -886,7 +896,7 @@ int hmm_range_register(struct hmm_range *range,
 		return -EFAULT;
 
 	/* Initialize range to track CPU page table updates. */
-	mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
 
 	range->hmm = hmm;
 	kref_get(&hmm->kref);
@@ -898,7 +908,7 @@ int hmm_range_register(struct hmm_range *range,
 	 */
 	if (!hmm->notifiers)
 		range->valid = true;
-	mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -914,10 +924,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(hmm_range_register);
 void hmm_range_unregister(struct hmm_range *range)
 {
 	struct hmm *hmm = range->hmm;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
-	mutex_lock(&hmm->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
 	list_del_init(&range->list);
-	mutex_unlock(&hmm->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hmm->ranges_lock, flags);
 
 	/* Drop reference taken by hmm_range_register() */
 	mmput(hmm->mm);
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-01  6:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-01  6:19 dev_pagemap related cleanups v4 Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-01  6:19 ` [PATCH 01/22] mm/hmm.c: suppress compilation warnings when CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is not set Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-01  6:20 ` [PATCH 02/22] mm/hmm: update HMM documentation Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-01  6:20 ` [PATCH 03/22] mm/hmm: clean up some coding style and comments Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-01  6:20 ` [PATCH 04/22] mm/hmm: support automatic NUMA balancing Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-01  6:20 ` [PATCH 05/22] mm/hmm: Only set FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY for non-blocking Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-01  6:20 ` [PATCH 06/22] mm/hmm: fix use after free with struct hmm in the mmu notifiers Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-01  6:20 ` [PATCH 07/22] mm/hmm: Use hmm_mirror not mm as an argument for hmm_range_register Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-01  6:20 ` [PATCH 08/22] mm/hmm: Hold a mmgrab from hmm to mm Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-01  6:20 ` [PATCH 09/22] mm/hmm: Simplify hmm_get_or_create and make it reliable Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-01  6:20 ` [PATCH 10/22] mm/hmm: Remove duplicate condition test before wait_event_timeout Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-01  6:20 ` [PATCH 11/22] mm/hmm: Do not use list*_rcu() for hmm->ranges Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-01  6:20 ` [PATCH 12/22] mm/hmm: Hold on to the mmget for the lifetime of the range Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-01  6:20 ` [PATCH 13/22] mm/hmm: Use lockdep instead of comments Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-01  6:20 ` [PATCH 14/22] mm/hmm: Remove racy protection against double-unregistration Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-01  6:20 ` [PATCH 15/22] mm/hmm: Poison hmm_range during unregister Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-01  6:20 ` [PATCH 16/22] mm/hmm: Remove confusing comment and logic from hmm_release Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-01  6:20 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-07-01  6:20 ` [PATCH 18/22] mm: return valid info from hmm_range_unregister Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-03 17:22   ` Ralph Campbell
2019-07-01  6:20 ` [PATCH 19/22] mm: always return EBUSY for invalid ranges in hmm_range_{fault,snapshot} Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-02 21:43   ` Kuehling, Felix
2019-07-03 17:32   ` Ralph Campbell
2019-07-01  6:20 ` [PATCH 20/22] mm: move hmm_vma_fault to nouveau Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-03 17:48   ` Ralph Campbell
2019-07-03 17:50     ` [Nouveau] " Ilia Mirkin
2019-07-03 18:03   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-03 18:05     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-03 18:13       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-01  6:20 ` [PATCH 21/22] nouveau: unlock mmap_sem on all errors from nouveau_range_fault Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-01  6:20 ` [PATCH 22/22] mm: remove the legacy hmm_pfn_* APIs Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-03 18:01   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-03 18:03     ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-03 18:15       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-01  8:25 ` dev_pagemap related cleanups v4 Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-02 18:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-07-02 22:45     ` Weiny, Ira
2019-07-02 22:47       ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-07-02 23:17     ` Dan Williams
2019-07-03  1:08       ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190701062020.19239-18-hch@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=Philip.Yang@amd.com \
    --cc=bskeggs@redhat.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rcampbell@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).