From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F01C432C3 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA4A20872 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:49:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BAA4A20872 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 480286B0302; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 04:49:14 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 409AC6B0304; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 04:49:14 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 2D3666B0305; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 04:49:14 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0132.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.132]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151B06B0302 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 04:49:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin07.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C2956A751 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:49:13 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76179811386.07.nut83_6d98eedf6ee5e X-HE-Tag: nut83_6d98eedf6ee5e X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3981 Received: from mx1.suse.de (mx2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by imf11.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:49:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A829AE39; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:49:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quack2.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0C6121E47FC; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:49:08 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 10:49:08 +0100 From: Jan Kara To: John Hubbard Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Al Viro , Alex Williamson , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_T=F6pel?= , Christoph Hellwig , Dan Williams , Daniel Vetter , Dave Chinner , David Airlie , "David S . Miller" , Ira Weiny , Jan Kara , Jason Gunthorpe , Jens Axboe , Jonathan Corbet , =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , Magnus Karlsson , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Michael Ellerman , Michal Hocko , Mike Kravetz , Paul Mackerras , Shuah Khan , Vlastimil Babka , bpf@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , "Aneesh Kumar K . V" Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 02/24] mm/gup: factor out duplicate code from four routines Message-ID: <20191121094908.GB18190@quack2.suse.cz> References: <20191121071354.456618-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com> <20191121071354.456618-3-jhubbard@nvidia.com> <20191121080356.GA24784@lst.de> <852f6c27-8b65-547b-89e0-e8f32a4d17b9@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <852f6c27-8b65-547b-89e0-e8f32a4d17b9@nvidia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu 21-11-19 00:29:59, John Hubbard wrote: > On 11/21/19 12:03 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Otherwise this looks fine and might be a worthwhile cleanup to feed > > Andrew for 5.5 independent of the gut of the changes. > > > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig > > > > Thanks for the reviews! Say, it sounds like your view here is that this > series should be targeted at 5.6 (not 5.5), is that what you have in mind? > And get the preparatory patches (1-9, and maybe even 10-16) into 5.5? Yeah, actually I feel the same. The merge window is going to open on Sunday and the series isn't still fully baked and happily sitting in linux-next (and larger changes should really sit in linux-next for at least a week, preferably two, before the merge window opens to get some reasonable test coverage). So I'd take out the independent easy patches that are already reviewed, get them merged into Andrew's (or whatever other appropriate tree) now so that they get at least a week of testing in linux-next before going upstream. And the more involved bits will have to wait for 5.6 - which means let's just continue working on them as we do now because ideally in 4 weeks we should have them ready with all the reviews so that they can be picked up and integrated into linux-next. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR