From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/page_vma_mapped: page table boundary is already guaranteed
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 14:39:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191128223904.GG20752@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191128210945.6gtt7wlygsvxip4n@master>
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 09:09:45PM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 11:31:43AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> >On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 09:03:21AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> >> The check here is to guarantee pvmw->address iteration is limited in one
> >> page table boundary. To be specific, here the address range should be in
> >> one PMD_SIZE.
> >>
> >> If my understanding is correct, this check is already done in the above
> >> check:
> >>
> >> address >= __vma_address(page, vma) + PMD_SIZE
> >>
> >> The boundary check here seems not necessary.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
> >
> >NAK.
> >
> >THP can be mapped with PTE not aligned to PMD_SIZE. Consider mremap().
> >
>
> Hi, Kirill
>
> Thanks for your comment during Thanks Giving Day. Happy holiday:-)
>
> I didn't think about this case before, thanks for reminding. Then I tried to
> understand your concern.
>
> mremap() would expand/shrink a memory mapping. In this case, probably shrink
> is in concern. Since pvmw->page and pvmw->vma are not changed in the loop, the
> case you mentioned maybe pvmw->page is the head of a THP but part of it is
> unmapped.
mremap() can also move a mapping, see MREMAP_FIXED.
> This means the following condition stands:
>
> vma->vm_start <= vma_address(page)
> vma->vm_end <= vma_address(page) + page_size(page)
>
> Since we have checked address with vm_end, do you think this case is also
> guarded?
>
> Not sure my understanding is correct, look forward your comments.
>
> >> Test:
> >> more than 48 hours kernel build test shows this code is not touched.
> >
> >Not an argument. I doubt mremap(2) is ever called in kernel build
> >workload.
> >
> >--
> > Kirill A. Shutemov
>
> --
> Wei Yang
> Help you, Help me
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-28 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-28 1:03 [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_vma_mapped: use PMD_SIZE instead of calculating it Wei Yang
2019-11-28 1:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/page_vma_mapped: page table boundary is already guaranteed Wei Yang
2019-11-28 8:31 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-11-28 21:09 ` Wei Yang
2019-11-28 22:39 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2019-11-29 8:30 ` Wei Yang
2019-11-29 11:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-02 6:53 ` Wei Yang
2019-11-28 8:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/page_vma_mapped: use PMD_SIZE instead of calculating it Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-11-28 21:22 ` Wei Yang
2019-12-02 8:03 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-12-02 8:54 ` Wei Yang
2019-12-02 22:21 ` Wei Yang
2019-12-03 9:47 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-12-03 15:14 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191128223904.GG20752@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).