From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: make it clear that gfp reclaim modifiers are valid only for sleepable allocations
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 21:38:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200407013855.GA11326@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2004031241380.230548@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 12:41:51PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2020, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> >
> > While it might be really clear to MM developers that gfp reclaim
> > modifiers are applicable only to sleepable allocations (those with
> > __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM) it seems that actual users of the API are not
> > always sure. Make it explicit that they are not applicable for
> > GFP_NOWAIT or GFP_ATOMIC allocations which are the most commonly used
> > non-sleepable allocation masks.
> >
> > Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>
> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
thanks,
- Joel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-07 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-03 8:35 [PATCH 0/2] mm: few refinements to gfp flags documentation Michal Hocko
2020-04-03 8:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: clarify __GFP_MEMALLOC usage Michal Hocko
2020-04-03 19:41 ` David Rientjes
2020-04-03 21:23 ` NeilBrown
2020-04-06 7:01 ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-06 19:02 ` John Hubbard
2020-04-06 23:32 ` David Rientjes
2020-04-06 23:40 ` John Hubbard
2020-04-14 2:15 ` Andrew Morton
2020-04-14 3:56 ` NeilBrown
2020-04-14 19:05 ` John Hubbard
2020-04-07 1:00 ` NeilBrown
2020-04-07 1:21 ` John Hubbard
2020-04-07 7:24 ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-03 8:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: make it clear that gfp reclaim modifiers are valid only for sleepable allocations Michal Hocko
2020-04-03 19:41 ` David Rientjes
2020-04-07 1:38 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200407013855.GA11326@google.com \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).