From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71ADCC2BA19 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:38:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302E92074D for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:38:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="e94n9Y+G" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 302E92074D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id C5CA08E0005; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 03:38:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id C0D128E0001; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 03:38:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id B055A8E0005; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 03:38:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0101.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.101]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AEC8E0001 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 03:38:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin23.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604A25DC5 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:38:19 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76705657518.23.war04_82d8ca7832f15 X-HE-Tag: war04_82d8ca7832f15 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2819 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by imf10.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D22E420575; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 07:38:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1586849898; bh=c3VeZmnJ21uO4nl4ipI0bU3GZYnYIrzWwg7ElW9HfPI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=e94n9Y+GtlyXQJiMemhpG+YBmqCcUf11viZViWfVtiWxBg6xFDMrZBSTun5L7rD3o eGdz5EqGWdIqYwfU6XQgFo7vt5kxDHs9afTdqsJFjtwQwVZHlTMiE76GMfFJqRqQRv cTzrdlOP+2fzUpFhH3I95pdBlcXkVof8bn0PWzS0= Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 09:38:16 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Luis Chamberlain Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, bvanassche@acm.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz, ming.lei@redhat.com, nstange@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com, yukuai3@huawei.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] blktrace: fix use after free Message-ID: <20200414073816.GC4111599@kroah.com> References: <20200414041902.16769-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200414041902.16769-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 04:18:57AM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > After two iterations of RFCs I think this is ready now. I've taken > the feedback from the last series, both on code and commit log. > I've also extended the commit log on the last patch to also explain > how the original shift to async request_queue removal turned out > to actually be a userspace regression and added a respective fixes > tag for it. > > You can find these patches on my 20200414-dev-blkqueue-defer-removal-patch-v1 > branch based on linux-next tag next-20200414 on kernel.org [0]. > > Further review and rants are appreciated. > > [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux-next.git/log/?h=20200414-dev-blkqueue-defer-removal > > Luis Chamberlain (5): > block: move main block debugfs initialization to its own file > blktrace: fix debugfs use after free > blktrace: refcount the request_queue during ioctl > mm/swapfile: refcount block and queue before using > blkcg_schedule_throttle() > block: revert back to synchronous request_queue removal Looks good from a debugfs point of view, thanks for doing this cleanup. greg k-h