linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: shakeelb@google.com, chris@chrisdown.name, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm, memcg: fix inconsistent oom event behavior
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:22:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200414152257.GP4629@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200414015952.3590-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com>

On Mon 13-04-20 21:59:52, Yafang Shao wrote:
> A recent commit 9852ae3fe529 ("mm, memcg: consider subtrees in
> memory.events") changes the behavior of memcg events, which will
> consider subtrees in memory.events. But oom_kill event is a special one
> as it is used in both cgroup1 and cgroup2. In cgroup1, it is displayed
> in memory.oom_control. The file memory.oom_control is in both root memcg
> and non root memcg, that is different with memory.event as it only in
> non-root memcg. That commit is okay for cgroup2, but it is not okay for
> cgroup1 as it will cause inconsistent behavior between root memcg and
> non-root memcg.
> 
> Here's an example on why this behavior is inconsistent in cgroup1.
>      root memcg
>      /
>   memcg foo
>    /
> memcg bar
> 
> Suppose there's an oom_kill in memcg bar, then the oon_kill will be
> 
>      root memcg : memory.oom_control(oom_kill)  0
>      /
>   memcg foo : memory.oom_control(oom_kill)  1
>    /
> memcg bar : memory.oom_control(oom_kill)  1
> 
> For the non-root memcg, its memory.oom_control(oom_kill) includes its
> descendants' oom_kill, but for root memcg, it doesn't include its
> descendants' oom_kill. That means, memory.oom_control(oom_kill) has
> different meanings in different memcgs. That is inconsistent. Then the user
> has to know whether the memcg is root or not.
> 
> If we can't fully support it in cgroup1, for example by adding
> memory.events.local into cgroup1 as well, then let's don't touch
> its original behavior. So let's recover the original behavior for cgroup1.

Wthe localevents was mostly cgroup v2 feature. I do not think there was
an intention to have side effects on the legacy hierarchy. I thought
this would be the case but it is not apparently. Would it make more
sense to have CGRP_ROOT_MEMORY_LOCAL_EVENTS for legacy hierarchy by
default rather than special casing it somewhere quite deep in the code?

> Fixes: 9852ae3fe529 ("mm, memcg: consider subtrees in memory.events")
> Cc: Chris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> index 8c340e6b347f..a0ae080a67d1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -798,7 +798,8 @@ static inline void memcg_memory_event(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  		atomic_long_inc(&memcg->memory_events[event]);
>  		cgroup_file_notify(&memcg->events_file);
>  
> -		if (cgrp_dfl_root.flags & CGRP_ROOT_MEMORY_LOCAL_EVENTS)
> +		if (cgrp_dfl_root.flags & CGRP_ROOT_MEMORY_LOCAL_EVENTS ||
> +		    !cgroup_subsys_on_dfl(memory_cgrp_subsys))
>  			break;
>  	} while ((memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)) &&
>  		 !mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg));
> -- 
> 2.18.2

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-14 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-14  1:59 [PATCH v2] mm, memcg: fix inconsistent oom event behavior Yafang Shao
2020-04-14 15:22 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2020-04-14 15:57   ` Yafang Shao
2020-04-22 11:06 Yafang Shao
2020-04-22 11:51 ` Michal Hocko
2020-04-22 12:54 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-04-22 12:58   ` Yafang Shao
2020-04-22 13:02     ` Chris Down
2020-04-22 13:15       ` Yafang Shao
2020-04-22 13:15   ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200414152257.GP4629@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris@chrisdown.name \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).