From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
axboe@kernel.dk, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mingo@redhat.com, jack@suse.cz, ming.lei@redhat.com,
nstange@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com,
yukuai3@huawei.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] blktrace: refcount the request_queue during ioctl
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 05:29:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200416052909.GI11244@42.do-not-panic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a71d9c9b-72c8-8905-aeba-08e5382f5a81@acm.org>
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 08:43:32PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 2020-04-15 18:12, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 07:18:22AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >> blk_get_queue() prevents concurrent freeing of struct request_queue but
> >> does not prevent concurrent blk_cleanup_queue() calls.
> >
> > Wouldn't concurrent blk_cleanup_queue() calls be a bug? If so should
> > I make it clear that it would be or simply prevent it?
>
> I think calling blk_cleanup_queue() while the queue refcount > 0 is well
> established behavior. At least the SCSI core triggers that behavior
> since a very long time. I prefer not to change that behavior.
I see. An alternative is to simply check if we already are cleaning up
and if so abort early on the blk_cleanup_queue(). That would allow
re-entrant calls, and just be a no-op to the additional calls. Or is
the re-entrant, two attemps to really do all the work
blk_cleanup_queue() expected functionality already?
> Regarding patch 3/5: how about dropping that patch? If the queue
> refcount can drop to zero while blk_trace_ioctl() is in progress I think
> that should be fixed in the block_device_operations.open callback
> instead of in blk_trace_ioctl().
I'll take a look, thanks!
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-16 5:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-14 4:18 [PATCH 0/5] blktrace: fix use after free Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-14 4:18 ` [PATCH 1/5] block: move main block debugfs initialization to its own file Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-14 7:35 ` Greg KH
2020-04-15 2:44 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-14 4:18 ` [PATCH 2/5] blktrace: fix debugfs use after free Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-14 7:37 ` Greg KH
2020-04-14 15:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-15 2:46 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-15 17:38 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-04-15 21:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-16 0:56 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-16 1:02 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-04-16 1:20 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-16 2:10 ` Ming Lei
2020-04-16 5:25 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-16 5:47 ` Ming Lei
2020-04-16 6:09 ` Ming Lei
2020-04-16 6:22 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-16 6:20 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-16 6:28 ` Ming Lei
2020-04-17 4:09 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-14 4:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] blktrace: refcount the request_queue during ioctl Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-14 15:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-15 6:16 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-15 7:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-15 12:34 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-15 12:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-15 13:25 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-15 14:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-16 1:12 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-16 3:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-16 5:29 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2020-04-15 14:45 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-16 1:17 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-16 2:31 ` Ming Lei
2020-04-16 5:36 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-14 4:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] mm/swapfile: refcount block and queue before using blkcg_schedule_throttle() Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-14 15:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-15 5:42 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-15 7:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-15 7:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-15 13:19 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-16 6:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-16 6:22 ` Ming Lei
2020-04-16 6:25 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-16 6:34 ` Ming Lei
2020-04-14 4:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] block: revert back to synchronous request_queue removal Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-14 15:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 20:58 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-15 6:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-15 13:20 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-04-16 2:36 ` Ming Lei
2020-04-14 7:38 ` [PATCH 0/5] blktrace: fix use after free Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200416052909.GI11244@42.do-not-panic.com \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nstange@suse.de \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).