linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] sysctl: pass kernel pointers to ->proc_handler
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 12:06:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200424190650.GA72647@rdna-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200424064338.538313-6-hch@lst.de>

Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> [Thu, 2020-04-23 23:44 -0700]:
> Instead of having all the sysctl handlers deal with user pointers, which
> is rather hairy in terms of the BPF interaction, copy the input to and
> from  userspace in common code.  This also means that the strings are
> always NUL-terminated by the common code, making the API a little bit
> safer.
> 
> As most handler just pass through the data to one of the common handlers
> a lot of the changes are mechnical.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Acked-by: Andrey Ignatov <rdna@fb.com>

...

> @@ -72,33 +70,21 @@ extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_autogroup_enabled;
>  extern int sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice;
>  extern int sched_rr_timeslice;
>  
> -extern int sched_rr_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> -		void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
> -		loff_t *ppos);
> -
> -extern int sched_rt_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> -		void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
> -		loff_t *ppos);
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK

Decided to skim through the patch one last time to double-check the fix
from previous iteration and found that this ifdef got lost below.

> -extern int sysctl_sched_uclamp_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> -				       void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
> -				       loff_t *ppos);
> -#endif
> -
> -extern int sysctl_numa_balancing(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> -				 void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
> -				 loff_t *ppos);
> -
> -extern int sysctl_schedstats(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> -				 void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
> -				 loff_t *ppos);
> +int sched_rr_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer,
> +		size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos);
> +int sched_rt_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer,
> +		size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos);
> +int sysctl_sched_uclamp_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> +		void *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos);

Here ^^

-- 
Andrey Ignatov


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-24 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-24  6:43 pass kernel pointers to the sysctl ->proc_handler method v3 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-24  6:43 ` [PATCH 1/5] bpf-cgroup: remove unused exports Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-24  6:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: remove watermark_boost_factor_sysctl_handler Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-04 18:41   ` Kees Cook
2020-04-24  6:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] sysctl: remove all extern declaration from sysctl.c Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-04  1:25   ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-04 18:42   ` Kees Cook
2020-04-24  6:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] sysctl: avoid forward declarations Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-04 18:44   ` Kees Cook
2020-04-24  6:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] sysctl: pass kernel pointers to ->proc_handler Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-24 19:06   ` Andrey Ignatov [this message]
2020-04-27  5:34     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-04 19:01   ` Kees Cook
2020-05-05  5:57     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-26 15:51 ` pass kernel pointers to the sysctl ->proc_handler method v3 Alexei Starovoitov
2020-04-27  5:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-26 15:59 ` Al Viro
2020-04-27  5:36   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-27  7:15     ` Al Viro
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-04-21 17:15 pass kernel pointers to the sysctl ->proc_handler method v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 17:15 ` [PATCH 5/5] sysctl: pass kernel pointers to ->proc_handler Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 19:16   ` Al Viro
2020-04-22  2:46     ` Al Viro
2020-04-22  6:09       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-21 19:23   ` Andrey Ignatov
2020-04-22 17:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-22 23:40       ` Andrey Ignatov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200424190650.GA72647@rdna-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
    --to=rdna@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yzaikin@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).