linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org,Dave Hansen
	<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com,rientjes@google.com,ying.huang@intel.com,dan.j.williams@intel.com,david@redhat.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 3/9] mm/migrate: update migration order during on hotplug events
Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 09:17:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201007161741.DDC85648@viggo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201007161736.ACC6E387@viggo.jf.intel.com>


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

Reclaim-based migration is attempting to optimize data placement in
memory based on the system topology.  If the system changes, so must
the migration ordering.

The implementation here is pretty simple and entirely unoptimized.  On
any memory or CPU hotplug events, assume that a node was added or
removed and recalculate all migration targets.  This ensures that the
node_demotion[] array is always ready to be used in case the new
reclaim mode is enabled.

This recalculation is far from optimal, most glaringly that it does
not even attempt to figure out if nodes are actually coming or going.
But, given the expected paucity of hotplug events, this should be
fine.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---

 b/mm/migrate.c |   93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+)

diff -puN mm/migrate.c~enable-numa-demotion mm/migrate.c
--- a/mm/migrate.c~enable-numa-demotion	2020-10-07 09:15:28.260642449 -0700
+++ b/mm/migrate.c	2020-10-07 09:15:28.266642449 -0700
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
 #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
 #include <linux/ptrace.h>
 #include <linux/oom.h>
+#include <linux/memory.h>
 
 #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
 
@@ -3241,9 +3242,101 @@ again:
 		goto again;
 }
 
+/*
+ * For callers that do not hold get_online_mems() already.
+ */
 void set_migration_target_nodes(void)
 {
 	get_online_mems();
 	__set_migration_target_nodes();
 	put_online_mems();
 }
+
+/*
+ * React to hotplug events that might affect the migration targes
+ * like events that online or offline NUMA nodes.
+ *
+ * The ordering is also currently dependent on which nodes have
+ * CPUs.  That means we need CPU on/offline notification too.
+ */
+static int migration_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	set_migration_target_nodes();
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int migration_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+	set_migration_target_nodes();
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * This leaves migrate-on-reclaim transiently disabled
+ * between the MEM_GOING_OFFLINE and MEM_OFFLINE events.
+ * This runs reclaim-based micgration is enabled or not.
+ * This ensures that the user can turn reclaim-based
+ * migration at any time without needing to recalcuate
+ * migration targets.
+ *
+ * These callbacks already hold get_online_mems().  That
+ * is why __set_migration_target_nodes() can be used as
+ * opposed to set_migration_target_nodes().
+ */
+#if defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG)
+static int __meminit migrate_on_reclaim_callback(struct notifier_block *self,
+						 unsigned long action, void *arg)
+{
+	switch (action) {
+	case MEM_GOING_OFFLINE:
+		/*
+		 * Make sure there are not transient states where
+		 * an offline node is a migration target.  This
+		 * will leave migration disabled until the offline
+		 * completes and the MEM_OFFLINE case below runs.
+		 */
+		disable_all_migrate_targets();
+		break;
+	case MEM_OFFLINE:
+	case MEM_ONLINE:
+		/*
+		 * Recalculate the target nodes once the node
+		 * reaches its final state (online or offline).
+		 */
+		__set_migration_target_nodes();
+		break;
+	case MEM_CANCEL_OFFLINE:
+		/*
+		 * MEM_GOING_OFFLINE disabled all the migration
+		 * targets.  Reenable them.
+		 */
+		__set_migration_target_nodes();
+		break;
+	case MEM_GOING_ONLINE:
+	case MEM_CANCEL_ONLINE:
+		break;
+	}
+
+	return notifier_from_errno(0);
+}
+
+static int __init migrate_on_reclaim_init(void)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "migrate on reclaim",
+				migration_online_cpu,
+				migration_offline_cpu);
+	/*
+	 * In the unlikely case that this fails, the automatic
+	 * migration targets may become suboptimal for nodes
+	 * where N_CPU changes.  With such a small impact in a
+	 * rare case, do not bother trying to do anything special.
+	 */
+	WARN_ON(ret < 0);
+
+	hotplug_memory_notifier(migrate_on_reclaim_callback, 100);
+	return 0;
+}
+late_initcall(migrate_on_reclaim_init);
+#endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
_


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-07 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-07 16:17 [RFC][PATCH 0/9] [v4][RESEND] Migrate Pages in lieu of discard Dave Hansen
2020-10-07 16:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/9] mm/numa: node demotion data structure and lookup Dave Hansen
2020-10-07 16:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/9] mm/numa: automatically generate node migration order Dave Hansen
2020-10-07 16:17 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2020-10-07 18:08   ` [RFC][PATCH 3/9] mm/migrate: update migration order during on hotplug events osalvador
2020-10-07 16:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/9] mm/migrate: make migrate_pages() return nr_succeeded Dave Hansen
2020-10-07 16:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/9] mm/migrate: demote pages during reclaim Dave Hansen
2020-10-27 15:29   ` Oscar Salvador
2020-10-27 16:53     ` Yang Shi
2020-10-07 16:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/9] mm/vmscan: add page demotion counter Dave Hansen
2020-10-19  7:37   ` Huang, Ying
2020-10-27 16:41     ` Yang Shi
2020-10-28  1:25       ` Huang, Ying
2020-10-07 16:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/9] mm/vmscan: Consider anonymous pages without swap Dave Hansen
2020-10-29  8:14   ` Oscar Salvador
2020-10-29 14:33     ` Dave Hansen
2020-10-29 15:57       ` Yang Shi
2020-10-29 19:08         ` osalvador
2020-10-29 19:30           ` Yang Shi
2020-10-07 16:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 8/9] mm/vmscan: never demote for memcg reclaim Dave Hansen
2020-10-07 16:17 ` [RFC][PATCH 9/9] mm/migrate: new zone_reclaim_mode to enable reclaim migration Dave Hansen
2020-10-12 21:30 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/9] [v4][RESEND] Migrate Pages in lieu of discard Yang Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201007161741.DDC85648@viggo.jf.intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).