linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: glittao@gmail.com
Cc: brendanhiggins@google.com, cl@linux.com, penberg@kernel.org,
	rientjes@google.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, elver@google.com,
	dlatypov@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] mm/slub, kunit: add a KUnit test for SLUB debugging functionality
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 21:44:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210512214440.e2cb47f751137db9802da62e@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210511150734.3492-2-glittao@gmail.com>

On Tue, 11 May 2021 17:07:33 +0200 glittao@gmail.com wrote:

> From: Oliver Glitta <glittao@gmail.com>
> 
> SLUB has resiliency_test() function which is hidden behind #ifdef
> SLUB_RESILIENCY_TEST that is not part of Kconfig, so nobody
> runs it. KUnit should be a proper replacement for it.
> 
> Try changing byte in redzone after allocation and changing
> pointer to next free node, first byte, 50th byte and redzone
> byte. Check if validation finds errors.
> 
> There are several differences from the original resiliency test:
> Tests create own caches with known state instead of corrupting
> shared kmalloc caches.
> 
> The corruption of freepointer uses correct offset, the original
> resiliency test got broken with freepointer changes.
> 
> Scratch changing random byte test, because it does not have
> meaning in this form where we need deterministic results.
> 
> Add new option CONFIG_SLUB_KUNIT_TEST in Kconfig.
> Tests next_pointer, first_word and clobber_50th_byte do not run
> with KASAN option on. Because the test deliberately modifies non-allocated
> objects.
> 
> Use kunit_resource to count errors in cache and silence bug reports.
> Count error whenever slab_bug() or slab_fix() is called or when
> the count of pages is wrong.
> 
> ...
>
>  lib/slub_kunit.c  | 155 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/slab.h         |   1 +
>  mm/slub.c         |  46 +++++++++++++-
>  5 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 lib/slub_kunit.c
> 
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 678c13967580..7723f58a9394 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -2429,6 +2429,18 @@ config BITS_TEST
> 
>  	  If unsure, say N.
> 
> +config SLUB_KUNIT_TEST
> +	tristate "KUnit test for SLUB cache error detection" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS

This means it can be compiled as a kernel module.  Did you runtime test the
code as a module?

ERROR: modpost: "kasan_enable_current" [lib/slub_kunit.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "kasan_disable_current" [lib/slub_kunit.ko] undefined!

--- a/mm/kasan/common.c~a
+++ a/mm/kasan/common.c
@@ -51,11 +51,14 @@ void kasan_enable_current(void)
 {
 	current->kasan_depth++;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(kasan_enable_current);
 
 void kasan_disable_current(void)
 {
 	current->kasan_depth--;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(kasan_disable_current);
+
 #endif /* CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC || CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS */
 
 void __kasan_unpoison_range(const void *address, size_t size)
_



  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-13  4:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-11 15:07 [PATCH v5 1/3] kunit: make test->lock irq safe glittao
2021-05-11 15:07 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] mm/slub, kunit: add a KUnit test for SLUB debugging functionality glittao
2021-05-11 15:16   ` Marco Elver
2021-05-12 10:30     ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-05-12 12:24     ` Oliver Glitta
2021-05-12 14:06   ` [PATCH] mm/slub, kunit: add a KUnit test for SLUB debugging functionality-fix glittao
2021-05-13  4:44   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2021-05-13  8:54     ` [PATCH v5 2/3] mm/slub, kunit: add a KUnit test for SLUB debugging functionality Marco Elver
2021-05-13  9:32     ` Oliver Glitta
2021-05-11 15:07 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] slub: remove resiliency_test() function glittao
2021-05-12 10:28 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] kunit: make test->lock irq safe Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210512214440.e2cb47f751137db9802da62e@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dlatypov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glittao@gmail.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).