From: sxwjean@me.com
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/slub: Simplify get_partial_node()
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 21:27:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240311132720.37741-1-sxwjean@me.com> (raw)
From: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
Remove the check of !kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial() because it is always
false, we've known this by calling kmem_cache_debug() before calling
remove_partial(), so we can remove the check.
Meanwhile, redo filling cpu partial and add comment to improve the
readability.
Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
---
mm/slub.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index a3ab096c38c0..62388f2a0ac7 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2620,19 +2620,21 @@ static struct slab *get_partial_node(struct kmem_cache *s,
if (!partial) {
partial = slab;
stat(s, ALLOC_FROM_PARTIAL);
- } else {
+
+ /* Fill cpu partial if needed from next iteration, or break */
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL))
+ continue;
+ else
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL)) {
put_cpu_partial(s, slab, 0);
stat(s, CPU_PARTIAL_NODE);
- partial_slabs++;
- }
-#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
- if (!kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial(s)
- || partial_slabs > s->cpu_partial_slabs / 2)
- break;
-#else
- break;
-#endif
+ if (++partial_slabs > s->cpu_partial_slabs/2)
+ break;
+ }
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
return partial;
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-03-11 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-11 13:27 sxwjean [this message]
2024-03-12 6:21 ` [PATCH] mm/slub: Simplify get_partial_node() Chengming Zhou
2024-03-12 6:53 ` Song, Xiongwei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240311132720.37741-1-sxwjean@me.com \
--to=sxwjean@me.com \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=xiongwei.song@windriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).