From: <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
To: <vbabka@suse.cz>, <rientjes@google.com>, <cl@linux.com>,
<penberg@kernel.org>, <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
<42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] SLUB: improve filling cpu partial a bit in get_partial_node()
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 13:58:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240404055826.1469415-1-xiongwei.song@windriver.com> (raw)
From: Xiongwei Song <xiongwei.song@windriver.com>
This series is to remove the unnecessary check for filling cpu partial
and improve the readability.
Introduce slub_get_cpu_partial() and dummy function to remove #ifdef of
CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL. Please check patch 2 and patch 3.
Also add the comparison in patch 3 for when breaking from filling cpu
partial loop with ">" or ">=". For more details, please check the
patch 3 inside.
No functionality changed.
Changes in v2:
- Refine the commit message(from Vlastimil Babka's comments).
- Refine the check conditions of filling cpu partial(as Vlastimil Babka
suggested).
- drop patch 4 of v1.
v1:
- https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240331021926.2732572-4-xiongwei.song@windriver.com/T/
Before v1:
- Actually, the series is the improvement of patch below:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/934f65c6-4d97-6c4d-b123-4937ede24a99@google.com/T/
Regards,
Xiongwei
Xiongwei Song (3):
mm/slub: remove the check of !kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial()
mm/slub: add slub_get_cpu_partial() helper
mm/slub: simplify get_partial_node()
mm/slub.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-04-04 5:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-04 5:58 xiongwei.song [this message]
2024-04-04 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/slub: remove the check of !kmem_cache_has_cpu_partial() xiongwei.song
2024-04-04 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm/slub: add slub_get_cpu_partial() helper xiongwei.song
2024-04-04 5:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm/slub: simplify get_partial_node() xiongwei.song
2024-04-04 9:26 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-04-07 1:47 ` Song, Xiongwei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240404055826.1469415-1-xiongwei.song@windriver.com \
--to=xiongwei.song@windriver.com \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).