linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: [akpm-mm:mm-unstable 457/479] arch/s390/kernel/uv.c:196:13: error: call to undeclared function 'page_mapping'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 15:54:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202404271523.VI3HNl2M-lkp@intel.com> (raw)

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-unstable
head:   e9efed1822aa2651d4970ee333ac8441557f9e33
commit: d3559f806797472fd2e79145cd1df9a524728ea0 [457/479] mm: remove page_mapping()
config: s390-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240427/202404271523.VI3HNl2M-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 5ef5eb66fb428aaf61fb51b709f065c069c11242)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240427/202404271523.VI3HNl2M-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404271523.VI3HNl2M-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from arch/s390/kernel/uv.c:14:
   In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:12:
   In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2258:
   include/linux/vmstat.h:500:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
     500 |         return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
         |                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
     501 |                            item];
         |                            ~~~~
   include/linux/vmstat.h:507:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
     507 |         return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
         |                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
     508 |                            NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS +
         |                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/vmstat.h:514:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
     514 |         return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_"
         |                               ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~
   include/linux/vmstat.h:519:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
     519 |         return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
         |                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
     520 |                            NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS +
         |                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/vmstat.h:528:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
     528 |         return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS +
         |                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
     529 |                            NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS +
         |                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   In file included from arch/s390/kernel/uv.c:14:
   In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:13:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:14:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:548:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     548 |         val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
         |                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:561:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     561 |         val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
         |                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
      37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
         |                                                           ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
     102 | #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
         |                                                      ^
   In file included from arch/s390/kernel/uv.c:14:
   In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:13:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:14:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:574:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     574 |         val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
         |                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
      35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
         |                                                           ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
     115 | #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
         |                                                      ^
   In file included from arch/s390/kernel/uv.c:14:
   In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:13:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
   In file included from include/linux/io.h:14:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:585:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     585 |         __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
         |                             ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:595:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     595 |         __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
         |                                                       ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:605:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     605 |         __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
         |                                                       ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:693:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     693 |         readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:701:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     701 |         readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:709:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     709 |         readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:718:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     718 |         writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                 ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:727:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     727 |         writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                 ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:736:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     736 |         writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                 ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> arch/s390/kernel/uv.c:196:13: error: call to undeclared function 'page_mapping'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     196 |         } else if (page_mapping(page)) {
         |                    ^
   arch/s390/kernel/uv.c:196:13: note: did you mean 'page_mapped'?
   include/linux/mm.h:1299:20: note: 'page_mapped' declared here
    1299 | static inline bool page_mapped(const struct page *page)
         |                    ^
   17 warnings and 1 error generated.


vim +/page_mapping +196 arch/s390/kernel/uv.c

380d97bd02fca7 Claudio Imbrenda 2021-09-20  182  
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21  183  /*
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21  184   * Calculate the expected ref_count for a page that would otherwise have no
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21  185   * further pins. This was cribbed from similar functions in other places in
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21  186   * the kernel, but with some slight modifications. We know that a secure
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21  187   * page can not be a huge page for example.
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21  188   */
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21  189  static int expected_page_refs(struct page *page)
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21  190  {
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21  191  	int res;
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21  192  
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21  193  	res = page_mapcount(page);
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21  194  	if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21  195  		res++;
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21 @196  	} else if (page_mapping(page)) {
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21  197  		res++;
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21  198  		if (page_has_private(page))
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21  199  			res++;
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21  200  	}
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21  201  	return res;
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21  202  }
214d9bbcd3a672 Claudio Imbrenda 2020-01-21  203  

:::::: The code at line 196 was first introduced by commit
:::::: 214d9bbcd3a67230b932f6cea83c078ab34d9e70 s390/mm: provide memory management functions for protected KVM guests

:::::: TO: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
:::::: CC: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki


             reply	other threads:[~2024-04-27  7:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-27  7:54 kernel test robot [this message]
2024-04-27 15:16 ` [akpm-mm:mm-unstable 457/479] arch/s390/kernel/uv.c:196:13: error: call to undeclared function 'page_mapping'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-29 16:46   ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202404271523.VI3HNl2M-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).