From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] mm/vmscan: Centralise timeout values for reclaim_throttle
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:38:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <76454f39-8e41-e757-3a71-c85303c6257e@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211008135332.19567-7-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
On 10/8/21 15:53, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Neil Brown raised concerns about callers of reclaim_throttle specifying
> a timeout value. The original timeout values to congestion_wait() were
> probably pulled out of thin air or copy&pasted from somewhere else.
> This patch centralises the timeout values and selects a timeout based
> on the reason for reclaim throttling. These figures are also pulled
> out of the same thin air but better values may be derived
>
> Running a workload that is throttling for inappropriate periods
> and tracing mm_vmscan_throttled can be used to pick a more appropriate
> value. Excessive throttling would pick a lower timeout where as
> excessive CPU usage in reclaim context would select a larger timeout.
> Ideally a large value would always be used and the wakeups would
> occur before a timeout but that requires careful testing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-14 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-08 13:53 [PATCH v3 0/8] Remove dependency on congestion_wait in mm/ Mel Gorman
2021-10-08 13:53 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm/vmscan: Throttle reclaim until some writeback completes if congested Mel Gorman
2021-10-13 15:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-14 10:47 ` Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 15:42 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-08 13:53 ` [PATCH 2/8] mm/vmscan: Throttle reclaim and compaction when too may pages are isolated Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 8:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-14 11:56 ` Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 15:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-08 13:53 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm/vmscan: Throttle reclaim when no progress is being made Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 12:31 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-14 13:03 ` Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 15:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-08 13:53 ` [PATCH 4/8] mm/writeback: Throttle based on page writeback instead of congestion Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 15:34 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-08 13:53 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm/page_alloc: Remove the throttling logic from the page allocator Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 15:36 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-08 13:53 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm/vmscan: Centralise timeout values for reclaim_throttle Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 15:38 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2021-10-08 13:53 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm/vmscan: Increase the timeout if page reclaim is not making progress Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 15:39 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-08 13:53 ` [PATCH 8/8] mm/vmscan: Delay waking of tasks throttled on NOPROGRESS Mel Gorman
2021-10-14 15:41 ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-10-19 9:01 [PATCH v4 0/8] Remove dependency on congestion_wait in mm/ Mel Gorman
2021-10-19 9:01 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm/vmscan: Centralise timeout values for reclaim_throttle Mel Gorman
2021-10-22 1:06 ` NeilBrown
2021-10-22 8:12 ` Mel Gorman
2021-10-22 14:46 [PATCH v5 0/8] Remove dependency on congestion_wait in mm/ Mel Gorman
2021-10-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm/vmscan: Centralise timeout values for reclaim_throttle Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=76454f39-8e41-e757-3a71-c85303c6257e@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).