linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>, <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>,
	<mawupeng1@huawei.com>, <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	<naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Cc: <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <justin.he@arm.com>,
	<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <ardb@kernel.org>,
	<ashish.kalra@amd.com>, <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	<bp@alien8.de>, <cuibixuan@linux.alibaba.com>,
	<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <james.morse@arm.com>,
	<jarkko@kernel.org>, <lenb@kernel.org>, <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
	<lvying6@huawei.com>, <rafael@kernel.org>, <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>,
	<zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 22:28:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <84fd1fad-604e-0835-2813-199195aaab69@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230411104842.37079-3-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>



On 2023/4/11 18:48, Shuai Xue wrote:
> Hardware errors could be signaled by synchronous interrupt, e.g.  when an
> error is detected by a background scrubber, or signaled by synchronous
> exception, e.g. when an uncorrected error is consumed. Both synchronous and
> asynchronous error are queued and handled by a dedicated kthread in
> workqueue.
> 
> commit 7f17b4a121d0 ("ACPI: APEI: Kick the memory_failure() queue for
> synchronous errors") keep track of whether memory_failure() work was
> queued, and make task_work pending to flush out the workqueue so that the
> work for synchronous error is processed before returning to user-space.
> The trick ensures that the corrupted page is unmapped and poisoned. And
> after returning to user-space, the task starts at current instruction which
> triggering a page fault in which kernel will send SIGBUS to current process
> due to VM_FAULT_HWPOISON.
> 
> However, the memory failure recovery for hwpoison-aware mechanisms does not
> work as expected. For example, hwpoison-aware user-space processes like
> QEMU register their customized SIGBUS handler and enable early kill mode by
> seting PF_MCE_EARLY at initialization. Then the kernel will directy notify
> the process by sending a SIGBUS signal in memory failure with wrong
> si_code: the actual user-space process accessing the corrupt memory
> location, but its memory failure work is handled in a kthread context, so
> it will send SIGBUS with BUS_MCEERR_AO si_code to the actual user-space
> process instead of BUS_MCEERR_AR in kill_proc().
> 
> To this end, separate synchronous and asynchronous error handling into
> different paths like X86 platform does:
> 
> - valid synchronous errors: queue a task_work to synchronously send SIGBUS
>    before ret_to_user.
> - valid asynchronous errors: queue a work into workqueue to asynchronously
>    handle memory failure.
> - abnormal branches such as invalid PA, unexpected severity, no memory
>    failure config support, invalid GUID section, OOM, etc.
> 
> Then for valid synchronous errors, the current context in memory failure is
> exactly belongs to the task consuming poison data and it will send SIBBUS
> with proper si_code.
> 
> Fixes: 7f17b4a121d0 ("ACPI: APEI: Kick the memory_failure() queue for synchronous errors")
> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
> Tested-by: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1@huawei.com>
> ---
>   drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>   include/acpi/ghes.h      |  3 --
>   mm/memory-failure.c      | 13 ------
>   3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index c479b85899f5..4b70955e25f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -452,28 +452,51 @@ static void ghes_clear_estatus(struct ghes *ghes,
>   }
>   
>   /*
> - * Called as task_work before returning to user-space.
> - * Ensure any queued work has been done before we return to the context that
> - * triggered the notification.
> + * struct sync_task_work - for synchronous RAS event
> + *
> + * @twork:                callback_head for task work
> + * @pfn:                  page frame number of corrupted page
> + * @flags:                fine tune action taken
> + *
> + * Structure to pass task work to be handled before
> + * ret_to_user via task_work_add().
>    */
> -static void ghes_kick_task_work(struct callback_head *head)
> +struct sync_task_work {
> +	struct callback_head twork;
> +	u64 pfn;
> +	int flags;
> +};
> +
> +static void memory_failure_cb(struct callback_head *twork)
>   {
> -	struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus;
> -	struct ghes_estatus_node *estatus_node;
> -	u32 node_len;
> +	int ret;
> +	struct sync_task_work *twcb =
> +		container_of(twork, struct sync_task_work, twork);
>   
> -	estatus_node = container_of(head, struct ghes_estatus_node, task_work);
> -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE))
> -		memory_failure_queue_kick(estatus_node->task_work_cpu);
> +	ret = memory_failure(twcb->pfn, twcb->flags);
> +	kfree(twcb);
>   
> -	estatus = GHES_ESTATUS_FROM_NODE(estatus_node);
> -	node_len = GHES_ESTATUS_NODE_LEN(cper_estatus_len(estatus));
> -	gen_pool_free(ghes_estatus_pool, (unsigned long)estatus_node, node_len);
> +	if (!ret)
> +		return;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * -EHWPOISON from memory_failure() means that it already sent SIGBUS
> +	 * to the current process with the proper error info,

This should be part of the comments of function memory_failure(),

> +	 * -EOPNOTSUPP means hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event,
> +	 *
and this part is already there
> +	 * In both cases, no further processing is required.
> +	 */
so, after that, I think we could drop this comment, also the same 
comment in x86's kill_me_maybe().

> +	if (ret == -EHWPOISON || ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
> +		return;
> +
> +	pr_err("Memory error not recovered");
> +	force_sig(SIGBUS);
>   }
>   
>   static bool ghes_do_memory_failure(u64 physical_addr, int flags)
>   {
>   	unsigned long pfn;
> +	struct sync_task_work *twcb;
>   
>   	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE))
>   		return false;
> @@ -486,6 +509,18 @@ static bool ghes_do_memory_failure(u64 physical_addr, int flags)
>   		return false;
>   	}
>   
> +	if (flags == MF_ACTION_REQUIRED && current->mm) {
> +		twcb = kmalloc(sizeof(*twcb), GFP_ATOMIC);
> +		if (!twcb)
> +			return false;
> +
> +		twcb->pfn = pfn;
> +		twcb->flags = flags;
> +		init_task_work(&twcb->twork, memory_failure_cb);
> +		task_work_add(current, &twcb->twork, TWA_RESUME);
> +		return true;
> +	}
> +
>   	memory_failure_queue(pfn, flags);
>   	return true;
>   }
> @@ -1000,9 +1035,8 @@ static void ghes_proc_in_irq(struct irq_work *irq_work)
>   	struct ghes_estatus_node *estatus_node;
>   	struct acpi_hest_generic *generic;
>   	struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus;
> -	bool task_work_pending;
> +	bool queued, sync;
>   	u32 len, node_len;
> -	int ret;
>   
>   	llnode = llist_del_all(&ghes_estatus_llist);
>   	/*
> @@ -1015,27 +1049,25 @@ static void ghes_proc_in_irq(struct irq_work *irq_work)
>   		estatus_node = llist_entry(llnode, struct ghes_estatus_node,
>   					   llnode);
>   		estatus = GHES_ESTATUS_FROM_NODE(estatus_node);
> +		sync = is_hest_sync_notify(estatus_node->ghes);
>   		len = cper_estatus_len(estatus);
>   		node_len = GHES_ESTATUS_NODE_LEN(len);
> -		task_work_pending = ghes_do_proc(estatus_node->ghes, estatus);
> +
> +		queued = ghes_do_proc(estatus_node->ghes, estatus) > +		/*
> +		 * If no memory failure work is queued for abnormal synchronous
> +		 * errors, do a force kill.
> +		 */
> +		if (sync && !queued)
> +			force_sig(SIGBUS);

It's better to move this part into function ghes_do_proc(), because 
there is already an is_hest_sync_notify(), and no need return value,
so make ghes_do_proc() a void function, Apart from this,

Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>

> +
>   		if (!ghes_estatus_cached(estatus)) {
>   			generic = estatus_node->generic;
>   			if (ghes_print_estatus(NULL, generic, estatus))
>   				ghes_estatus_cache_add(generic, estatus);
>   		}
> -
> -		if (task_work_pending && current->mm) {
> -			estatus_node->task_work.func = ghes_kick_task_work;
> -			estatus_node->task_work_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> -			ret = task_work_add(current, &estatus_node->task_work,
> -					    TWA_RESUME);
> -			if (ret)
> -				estatus_node->task_work.func = NULL;
> -		}
> -
> -		if (!estatus_node->task_work.func)
> -			gen_pool_free(ghes_estatus_pool,
> -				      (unsigned long)estatus_node, node_len);
> +		gen_pool_free(ghes_estatus_pool, (unsigned long)estatus_node,
> +			      node_len);
>   
>   		llnode = next;
>   	}
> @@ -1096,7 +1128,6 @@ static int ghes_in_nmi_queue_one_entry(struct ghes *ghes,
>   
>   	estatus_node->ghes = ghes;
>   	estatus_node->generic = ghes->generic;
> -	estatus_node->task_work.func = NULL;
>   	estatus = GHES_ESTATUS_FROM_NODE(estatus_node);
>   
>   	if (__ghes_read_estatus(estatus, buf_paddr, fixmap_idx, len)) {
> diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes.h b/include/acpi/ghes.h
> index 3c8bba9f1114..e5e0c308d27f 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/ghes.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/ghes.h
> @@ -35,9 +35,6 @@ struct ghes_estatus_node {
>   	struct llist_node llnode;
>   	struct acpi_hest_generic *generic;
>   	struct ghes *ghes;
> -
> -	int task_work_cpu;
> -	struct callback_head task_work;
>   };
>   
>   struct ghes_estatus_cache {
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index fae9baf3be16..6ea8c325acb3 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -2355,19 +2355,6 @@ static void memory_failure_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
>   	}
>   }
>   
> -/*
> - * Process memory_failure work queued on the specified CPU.
> - * Used to avoid return-to-userspace racing with the memory_failure workqueue.
> - */
> -void memory_failure_queue_kick(int cpu)
> -{
> -	struct memory_failure_cpu *mf_cpu;
> -
> -	mf_cpu = &per_cpu(memory_failure_cpu, cpu);
> -	cancel_work_sync(&mf_cpu->work);
> -	memory_failure_work_func(&mf_cpu->work);
> -}
> -
>   static int __init memory_failure_init(void)
>   {
>   	struct memory_failure_cpu *mf_cpu;


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-11 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20221027042445.60108-1-xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
2023-03-17  7:24 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions with proper si_code Shuai Xue
2023-03-20 18:03   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-03-30  6:11     ` Shuai Xue
2023-03-30  9:52       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-03-21  7:17   ` mawupeng
2023-03-22  1:27     ` Shuai Xue
2023-03-17  7:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events Shuai Xue
2023-03-17  7:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work Shuai Xue
2023-04-06 12:39   ` Xiaofei Tan
2023-04-07  2:21     ` Shuai Xue
2023-04-08  9:13 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions with proper si_code Shuai Xue
2023-04-08  9:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events Shuai Xue
2023-04-08  9:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work Shuai Xue
2023-04-11  1:44   ` Xiaofei Tan
2023-04-11  3:16     ` Shuai Xue
2023-04-11  9:02       ` Xiaofei Tan
2023-04-11  9:48         ` Shuai Xue
2023-04-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions with proper si_code Shuai Xue
2023-04-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events Shuai Xue
2023-04-11 14:17   ` Kefeng Wang
2023-04-12  2:54     ` Shuai Xue
2023-04-12  3:55   ` Xiaofei Tan
2023-04-13  1:42     ` Shuai Xue
2023-04-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work Shuai Xue
2023-04-11 14:28   ` Kefeng Wang [this message]
2023-04-12  2:58     ` Shuai Xue
2023-04-12  4:05   ` Xiaofei Tan
2023-04-13  1:49     ` Shuai Xue
2023-04-12 11:27 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions with proper si_code Shuai Xue
2023-04-12 11:28 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events Shuai Xue
2023-04-12 11:28 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work Shuai Xue
2023-04-17  1:14 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions with proper si_code Shuai Xue
2023-04-24  6:24   ` Shuai Xue
2023-05-08  1:55     ` Shuai Xue
2023-04-17  1:14 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events Shuai Xue
2023-04-17  1:14 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work Shuai Xue
2023-09-19  2:21 ` [RESEND PATCH v8 0/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous errors in task work with proper si_code Shuai Xue
2023-09-19  2:21 ` [RESEND PATCH v8 1/2] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events Shuai Xue
2023-09-25 14:43   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-26  6:23     ` Shuai Xue
2023-09-19  2:21 ` [RESEND PATCH v8 2/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work Shuai Xue
2023-09-25 15:00   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-26  6:38     ` Shuai Xue
2023-10-03  8:28   ` Naoya Horiguchi
2023-10-07  2:01     ` Shuai Xue
2023-10-07  7:28 ` [PATCH v9 0/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous errors in task work with proper si_code Shuai Xue
2023-11-21  1:48   ` Shuai Xue
2023-11-23 15:07   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-11-25  6:44     ` Shuai Xue
2023-11-25 12:10       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-11-26 12:25         ` Shuai Xue
2023-11-29 18:54           ` Borislav Petkov
2023-11-30  2:58             ` Shuai Xue
2023-11-30 14:40               ` Borislav Petkov
2023-11-30 17:43                 ` James Morse
2023-12-01  2:58                   ` Shuai Xue
2023-11-30 17:39             ` James Morse
2023-12-01  3:37               ` Shuai Xue
2023-10-07  7:28 ` [PATCH v9 1/2] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events Shuai Xue
2023-11-30 17:39   ` James Morse
2023-12-01  5:22     ` Shuai Xue
2023-10-07  7:28 ` [PATCH v9 2/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work Shuai Xue
2023-11-30 17:39   ` James Morse
2023-12-01  7:03     ` Shuai Xue
2023-12-18  6:45 ` [PATCH v10 0/4] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous errors in task work with proper si_code Shuai Xue
2023-12-18  6:45 ` [PATCH v10 1/4] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events Shuai Xue
2023-12-18  6:53   ` Greg KH
2023-12-21 13:55   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-12-22  1:07     ` Shuai Xue
2023-12-18  6:45 ` [PATCH v10 2/4] ACPI: APEI: send SIGBUS to current task if synchronous memory error not recovered Shuai Xue
2023-12-18  6:54   ` Greg KH
2023-12-18  6:45 ` [PATCH v10 3/4] mm: memory-failure: move memory_failure() return value documentation to function declaration Shuai Xue
2023-12-18  6:54   ` Greg KH
2023-12-18  6:45 ` [PATCH v10 4/4] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work Shuai Xue
2023-12-18  6:54   ` Greg KH
2024-02-04  8:01 ` [PATCH v11 0/3] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work to send correct SIGBUS si_code Shuai Xue
2024-02-19  1:46   ` Shuai Xue
2024-02-04  8:01 ` [PATCH v11 1/3] ACPI: APEI: send SIGBUS to current task if synchronous memory error not recovered Shuai Xue
2024-02-19  9:25   ` Borislav Petkov
2024-02-22  2:07     ` Shuai Xue
2024-02-23  5:26       ` Dan Williams
2024-02-23 12:08         ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-23 12:17           ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-24  6:08             ` Shuai Xue
2024-02-26 10:29               ` Borislav Petkov
2024-02-27  1:23                 ` Shuai Xue
2024-02-24 19:42             ` Dan Williams
2024-02-24 19:40     ` Dan Williams
2024-02-04  8:01 ` [PATCH v11 2/3] mm: memory-failure: move return value documentation to function declaration Shuai Xue
2024-02-26 10:46   ` Borislav Petkov
2024-02-27  1:27     ` Shuai Xue
2024-02-04  8:01 ` [PATCH v11 3/3] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work to send correct SIGBUS si_code Shuai Xue
2024-02-29  7:05   ` Shuai Xue
2024-03-08 10:18   ` Borislav Petkov
2024-03-12  6:05     ` Shuai Xue

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=84fd1fad-604e-0835-2813-199195aaab69@huawei.com \
    --to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cuibixuan@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=justin.he@arm.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lvying6@huawei.com \
    --cc=mawupeng1@huawei.com \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tanxiaofei@huawei.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
    --cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).