linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	arnd@arndb.de, corbet@lwn.net, mhocko@kernel.org,
	dave.hansen@intel.com, mingo@redhat.com, paulus@samba.org,
	aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v6 19/62] powerpc: ability to create execute-disabled pkeys
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 11:54:31 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bmo63p7c.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1500177424-13695-20-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>


Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> writes:

> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,18 @@
>  #define _ASM_PPC64_PKEYS_H
>
>  extern bool pkey_inited;
> +/* override any generic PKEY Permission defines */
> +#undef  PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS
> +#define PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS    0x1
> +#undef  PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE
> +#define PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE     0x2
> +#undef  PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE
> +#define PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE   0x4
> +#undef  PKEY_ACCESS_MASK
> +#define PKEY_ACCESS_MASK       (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS |\
> +				PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE  |\
> +				PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE)
> +

Is it ok to #undef macros from another header? Especially since said
header is in uapi (include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h).

Also, it's unnecessary to undef the _ACCESS and _WRITE macros since they
are identical to the original definition. And since these macros are
originally defined in an uapi header, the powerpc-specific ones should
be in an uapi header as well, if I understand it correctly.

An alternative solution is to define only PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE in
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/mman.h and then test for its existence to
properly define PKEY_ACCESS_MASK in
include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h. What do you think of the code
below?

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
index e31f5ee8e81f..67e6a3a343ae 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
@@ -4,17 +4,6 @@
 #include <asm/firmware.h>
 
 extern bool pkey_inited;
-/* override any generic PKEY Permission defines */
-#undef  PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS
-#define PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS    0x1
-#undef  PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE
-#define PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE     0x2
-#undef  PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE
-#define PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE   0x4
-#undef  PKEY_ACCESS_MASK
-#define PKEY_ACCESS_MASK       (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS |\
-				PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE  |\
-				PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE)
 
 #define ARCH_VM_PKEY_FLAGS (VM_PKEY_BIT0 | VM_PKEY_BIT1 | VM_PKEY_BIT2 | \
 				VM_PKEY_BIT3 | VM_PKEY_BIT4)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/mman.h b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
index ab45cc2f3101..dee43feb7c53 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/mman.h
@@ -45,4 +45,6 @@
 #define MAP_HUGE_1GB	(30 << MAP_HUGE_SHIFT)	/* 1GB   HugeTLB Page */
 #define MAP_HUGE_16GB	(34 << MAP_HUGE_SHIFT)	/* 16GB  HugeTLB Page */
 
+#define PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE   0x4
+
 #endif /* _UAPI_ASM_POWERPC_MMAN_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
index 72eb9a1bde79..777f8f8dff47 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
  * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License for
  * more details.
  */
-#include <uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h>
+#include <asm/mman.h>
 #include <linux/pkeys.h>                /* PKEY_*                       */
 
 bool pkey_inited;
diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
index 8c27db0c5c08..93e3841d9ada 100644
--- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
+++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h
@@ -74,7 +74,15 @@
 
 #define PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS	0x1
 #define PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE	0x2
+
+/* The arch-specific code may define PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE */
+#ifdef PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE
+#define PKEY_ACCESS_MASK       (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS |	\
+				PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE  |	\
+				PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE)
+#else
 #define PKEY_ACCESS_MASK	(PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS |\
 				 PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE)
+#endif
 
 #endif /* __ASM_GENERIC_MMAN_COMMON_H */


> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
> index 98d0391..b9ad98d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ int __arch_set_user_pkey_access(struct task_struct *tsk, int pkey,
>  		unsigned long init_val)
>  {
>  	u64 new_amr_bits = 0x0ul;
> +	u64 new_iamr_bits = 0x0ul;
>
>  	if (!is_pkey_enabled(pkey))
>  		return -1;
> @@ -85,5 +86,14 @@ int __arch_set_user_pkey_access(struct task_struct *tsk, int pkey,
>
>  	init_amr(pkey, new_amr_bits);
>
> +	/*
> +	 * By default execute is disabled.
> +	 * To enable execute, PKEY_ENABLE_EXECUTE
> +	 * needs to be specified.
> +	 */
> +	if ((init_val & PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE))
> +		new_iamr_bits |= IAMR_EX_BIT;
> +
> +	init_iamr(pkey, new_iamr_bits);
>  	return 0;
>  }

The comment seems to be from an earlier version which has the logic
inverted, and there is no PKEY_ENABLE_EXECUTE. Should the comment be
updated to the following?

    By default execute is enabled.
    To disable execute, PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE needs to be specified.

-- 
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-27 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-16  3:56 [RFC v6 00/62] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 01/62] powerpc: Free up four 64K PTE bits in 4K backed HPTE pages Ram Pai
2017-07-20  5:51   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-07-20 22:03     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 02/62] powerpc: Free up four 64K PTE bits in 64K " Ram Pai
2017-07-20  5:53   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 03/62] powerpc: introduce pte_set_hash_slot() helper Ram Pai
2017-07-20  5:56   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 04/62] powerpc: introduce pte_get_hash_gslot() helper Ram Pai
2017-07-20  5:57   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 05/62] powerpc: capture the PTE format changes in the dump pte report Ram Pai
2017-07-20  5:56   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 06/62] powerpc: use helper functions in __hash_page_64K() for 64K PTE Ram Pai
2017-07-20  5:58   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 07/62] powerpc: use helper functions in __hash_page_huge() " Ram Pai
2017-07-20  5:58   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 08/62] powerpc: use helper functions in __hash_page_4K() " Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 09/62] powerpc: use helper functions in __hash_page_4K() for 4K PTE Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 10/62] powerpc: use helper functions in flush_hash_page() Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 11/62] powerpc: initial pkey plumbing Ram Pai
2017-07-20  6:04   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-07-20 22:11     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 12/62] mm: introduce an additional vma bit for powerpc pkey Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 13/62] powerpc: track allocation status of all pkeys Ram Pai
2017-07-27 14:01   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-07-29 22:43     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-31 18:15   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 14/62] powerpc: helper function to read,write AMR,IAMR,UAMOR registers Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 15/62] powerpc: helper functions to initialize AMR, IAMR and UMOR registers Ram Pai
2017-07-27 20:40   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-07-30  0:38     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 16/62] powerpc: cleaup AMR,iAMR when a key is allocated or freed Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 17/62] powerpc: implementation for arch_set_user_pkey_access() Ram Pai
2017-07-27 14:15   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-07-29 22:59     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 18/62] powerpc: sys_pkey_alloc() and sys_pkey_free() system calls Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 19/62] powerpc: ability to create execute-disabled pkeys Ram Pai
2017-07-27 14:54   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]
2017-07-27 15:34     ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-07-29 23:24     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-31 12:59       ` Michael Ellerman
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 20/62] powerpc: store and restore the pkey state across context switches Ram Pai
2017-07-27 17:32   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-07-29 23:31     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-31 13:00       ` Michael Ellerman
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 21/62] powerpc: introduce execute-only pkey Ram Pai
2017-07-28 22:17   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-07-30  0:51     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-31 16:19       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-08-01  6:46     ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-01 16:14       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-08-02  9:40         ` Michael Ellerman
     [not found]           ` <20170817233555.GC5427@ram.oc3035372033.ibm.com>
2017-08-17 23:42             ` Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 22/62] powerpc: ability to associate pkey to a vma Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 23/62] powerpc: implementation for arch_override_mprotect_pkey() Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 24/62] powerpc: map vma key-protection bits to pte key bits Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 25/62] powerpc: sys_pkey_mprotect() system call Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 26/62] powerpc: Program HPTE key protection bits Ram Pai
2017-07-20  6:28   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 27/62] powerpc: helper to validate key-access permissions of a pte Ram Pai
2017-07-20  6:42   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-07-20 22:15     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-21  6:51       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-07-21 16:42         ` Ram Pai
2017-07-28 21:00   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2017-07-30  0:39     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 28/62] powerpc: check key protection for user page access Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 29/62] powerpc: Macro the mask used for checking DSI exception Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 30/62] powerpc: implementation for arch_vma_access_permitted() Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 31/62] powerpc: Handle exceptions caused by pkey violation Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 32/62] powerpc: capture AMR register content on " Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 33/62] powerpc: introduce get_pte_pkey() helper Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 34/62] powerpc: capture the violated protection key on fault Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 35/62] powerpc: Deliver SEGV signal on pkey violation Ram Pai
2017-08-19 19:09   ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-08-22 18:06     ` Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 36/62] mm: introduce arch_pkeys_enabled() Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 37/62] x86: implementation for arch_pkeys_enabled() Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 38/62] powerpc: " Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 39/62] mm: display pkey in smaps if arch_pkeys_enabled() is true Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 40/62] x86: delete arch_show_smap() Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 41/62] selftest/x86: Move protecton key selftest to arch neutral directory Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 42/62] selftest/vm: rename all references to pkru to a generic name Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 43/62] selftest/vm: move generic definitions to header file Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 44/62] selftest/vm: typecast the pkey register Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 45/62] selftest/vm: generics function to handle shadow key register Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 46/62] selftest/vm: fix the wrong assert in pkey_disable_set() Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 47/62] selftest/vm: fixed bugs in pkey_disable_clear() Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 48/62] selftest/vm: clear the bits in shadow reg when a pkey is freed Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 49/62] selftest/vm: fix alloc_random_pkey() to make it really random Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 50/62] selftest/vm: introduce two arch independent abstraction Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 51/62] selftest/vm: pkey register should match shadow pkey Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 52/62] selftest/vm: generic cleanup Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 53/62] selftest/vm: powerpc implementation for generic abstraction Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 54/62] selftest/vm: fix an assertion in test_pkey_alloc_exhaust() Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 55/62] selftest/vm: associate key on a mapped page and detect access violation Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 56/62] selftest/vm: detect no key violation on a freed key Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:56 ` [RFC v6 57/62] selftest/vm: associate key on a mapped page and detect write violation Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:57 ` [RFC v6 58/62] selftest/vm: detect no write key-violation on a freed key Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:57 ` [RFC v6 59/62] selftest/vm: detect write violation on a mapped access-denied-key page Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:57 ` [RFC v6 60/62] selftest/vm: sub-page allocator Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:57 ` [RFC v6 61/62] Documentation/x86: Move protecton key documentation to arch neutral directory Ram Pai
2017-07-16  3:57 ` [RFC v6 62/62] Documentation/vm: PowerPC specific updates to memory protection keys Ram Pai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87bmo63p7c.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).