From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/16] dax: Simplify root read-only definition for the 'resource' attribute
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 17:19:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lfsls4ac.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157309904959.1582359.7281180042781955506.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> writes:
> Rather than update the permission in ->is_visible() set the permission
> directly at declaration time.
>
Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/dax/bus.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dax/bus.c b/drivers/dax/bus.c
> index f3e6e00ece40..ce6d648d7670 100644
> --- a/drivers/dax/bus.c
> +++ b/drivers/dax/bus.c
> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static ssize_t resource_show(struct device *dev,
>
> return sprintf(buf, "%#llx\n", dev_dax_resource(dev_dax));
> }
> -static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(resource);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(resource, 0400, resource_show, NULL);
>
> static ssize_t modalias_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> char *buf)
> @@ -329,8 +329,6 @@ static umode_t dev_dax_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *a, int n)
>
> if (a == &dev_attr_target_node.attr && dev_dax_target_node(dev_dax) < 0)
> return 0;
> - if (a == &dev_attr_resource.attr)
> - return 0400;
> return a->mode;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-12 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-07 3:56 [PATCH 00/16] Memory Hierarchy: Enable target node lookups for reserved memory Dan Williams
2019-11-07 3:56 ` [PATCH 01/16] libnvdimm: Move attribute groups to device type Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:56 ` [PATCH 02/16] libnvdimm: Move region attribute group definition Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:29 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:56 ` [PATCH 03/16] libnvdimm: Move nd_device_attribute_group to device_type Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:30 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:56 ` [PATCH 04/16] libnvdimm: Move nd_numa_attribute_group " Dan Williams
2019-11-12 9:22 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-13 1:26 ` Dan Williams
2019-11-13 6:02 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-13 6:14 ` Dan Williams
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 05/16] libnvdimm: Move nd_region_attribute_group " Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:45 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 06/16] libnvdimm: Move nd_mapping_attribute_group " Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:45 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 07/16] libnvdimm: Move nvdimm_attribute_group " Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 08/16] libnvdimm: Move nvdimm_bus_attribute_group " Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 09/16] dax: Create a dax device_type Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:49 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 10/16] dax: Simplify root read-only definition for the 'resource' attribute Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:49 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 11/16] libnvdimm: " Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:50 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 12/16] dax: Add numa_node to the default device-dax attributes Dan Williams
2019-11-12 11:50 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 13/16] acpi/mm: Up-level "map to online node" functionality Dan Williams
2019-11-11 11:30 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-11 23:38 ` Dan Williams
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 14/16] x86/numa: Provide a range-to-target_node lookup facility Dan Williams
2019-11-07 3:57 ` [PATCH 15/16] libnvdimm/e820: Drop the wrapper around memory_add_physaddr_to_nid Dan Williams
2019-11-07 3:58 ` [PATCH 16/16] libnvdimm/e820: Retrieve and populate correct 'target_node' info Dan Williams
2019-11-09 5:02 ` kbuild test robot
2019-11-12 11:42 ` [PATCH 00/16] Memory Hierarchy: Enable target node lookups for reserved memory Aneesh Kumar K.V
2019-11-12 19:37 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87lfsls4ac.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).