linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Honglei Wang <honglei.wang@oracle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/vmscan: get number of pages on the LRU list in memcgroup base on lru_zone_size
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:40:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8926ba7a-9983-5b3f-b726-d1ff1230ef90@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191010143313.GJ18412@dhcp22.suse.cz>



On 10/10/19 10:33 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:

> I would just fix the LTP test. Coincidently I have discussed the very
> same thing with our QA guys just recently and the conclusion was to
> update the LTP and use a larger madvised memory area. I haven't checked
> whether this is upstream in LTP already. But please talk to LTP people.
> 
My QA colleague sync with me weeks ago, they have a workaround for this 
case in LTP which is signed-off-by both suse and oracle QA. So it's not 
a problem for LTP now. If we don't care this from kernel side, it's fine 
to drop it.

Thanks,
Honglei

> If there is no other reason to change the kernel code but the failing
> LTP test that doesn't really represent any real life scenario then I
> would simply keep the code as is. Andrew, could you drop it from the
> mmotm tree please?
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2019-10-11  1:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-05  7:10 [PATCH v2] mm/vmscan: get number of pages on the LRU list in memcgroup base on lru_zone_size Honglei Wang
2019-10-06  0:10 ` Andrew Morton
2019-10-07 14:28 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-08  9:34   ` Honglei Wang
2019-10-09 14:16     ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-10  8:40       ` Honglei Wang
2019-10-10 14:33         ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-11  1:40           ` Honglei Wang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8926ba7a-9983-5b3f-b726-d1ff1230ef90@oracle.com \
    --to=honglei.wang@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).