From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21683C41604 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 21:37:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F6D020882 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 21:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nvidia.com header.i=@nvidia.com header.b="A3zmsxRk" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9F6D020882 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id D72DF6B0074; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 17:37:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id D22986B0075; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 17:37:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id BEAA36B0078; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 17:37:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0195.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.195]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3736B0074 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 17:37:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin29.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0A4180AD807 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 21:37:04 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77346439968.29.hat67_3617af1271d2 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin29.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E5B18086CC2 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 21:37:03 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: hat67_3617af1271d2 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4918 Received: from hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com (hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com [216.228.121.65]) by imf33.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 21:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, AES256-SHA) id ; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 14:36:49 -0700 Received: from [10.2.85.86] (172.20.13.39) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 21:36:52 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] drm/exynos: Stop using frame_vector helpers To: Daniel Vetter CC: DRI Development , LKML , , Linux MM , Linux ARM , linux-samsung-soc , "open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" , , Daniel Vetter , "Jason Gunthorpe" , Inki Dae , Joonyoung Shim , Seung-Woo Kim , "Kyungmin Park" , Kukjin Kim , "Krzysztof Kozlowski" , Andrew Morton , =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= , Jan Kara , Dan Williams References: <20201007164426.1812530-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20201007164426.1812530-2-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <80718789-b3de-c30a-03c5-7c8cbf41f7d9@nvidia.com> From: John Hubbard Message-ID: <895eb064-1c8f-ecfc-0a98-1fbe40cb3161@nvidia.com> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:36:52 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.20.13.39] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1602106609; bh=OI3+pLVYL5cWSE4B2a2jiHWrJeRBVcUjCT4H6VDdVUk=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent: MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Originating-IP:X-ClientProxiedBy; b=A3zmsxRkTiEuP5NMToHsIjBexJZ1BRIWpMrbXsaDVyF7pGmKjuyPBJQTjoYnCT+Id Rh7uCABfImT6HrUYHb0dneU7xMwQcxjKSVOEB6uLjaVXfpYC3GRycDey9vhNW5mmoL jEbZuoQHH31CQTquNUREPNteX38ixLxxzHu2SsT2FwNmpb8XAJQj2e6AubzOwwCf8P V6JNWODSmsgKGWHO++1cASV1aBplJBXlrENJ9aSSd2jA/V2blcSUK8OOBGXEaMYN/S S6PO0PnBjGCbslJ42wDbWrRxEjHDBuLX0dG111P3JgKEC7Adhql3cu0O80p7PRSGSg 0YNay76WexGkg== X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 10/7/20 2:32 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 10:33 PM John Hubbard wrote: >> >> On 10/7/20 9:44 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: ... >>> @@ -398,15 +399,11 @@ static void g2d_userptr_put_dma_addr(struct g2d_data *g2d, >>> dma_unmap_sgtable(to_dma_dev(g2d->drm_dev), g2d_userptr->sgt, >>> DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, 0); >>> >>> - pages = frame_vector_pages(g2d_userptr->vec); >>> - if (!IS_ERR(pages)) { >>> - int i; >>> + for (i = 0; i < g2d_userptr->npages; i++) >>> + set_page_dirty_lock(g2d_userptr->pages[i]); >>> >>> - for (i = 0; i < frame_vector_count(g2d_userptr->vec); i++) >>> - set_page_dirty_lock(pages[i]); >>> - } >>> - put_vaddr_frames(g2d_userptr->vec); >>> - frame_vector_destroy(g2d_userptr->vec); >>> + unpin_user_pages(g2d_userptr->pages, g2d_userptr->npages); >>> + kvfree(g2d_userptr->pages); >> >> You can avoid writing your own loop, and just simplify the whole thing down to >> two lines: >> >> unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock(g2d_userptr->pages, g2d_userptr->npages, >> true); >> kvfree(g2d_userptr->pages); > > Oh nice, this is neat. I'll also roll it out in the habanalabs patch, > that has the same thing. Well almost, it only uses set_page_dirty, not > the _lock variant. But I have no idea whether that matters or not? It matters. And invariably, call sites that use set_page_dirty() instead of set_page_dirty_lock() were already wrong. Which is why I never had to provide anything like "unpin_user_pages_dirty (not locked)". Although in habanalabs case, I just reviewed patch 3 and I think they *were* correctly using set_page_dirty_lock()... thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA