From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@arm.com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/20] kasan, arm64: unpoison stack only with CONFIG_KASAN_STACK
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 20:38:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAeHK+wfzSjha_M88adfSE3qiOhJcCYeaAAu3YRXHpKqAK2L4Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201112095134.GI29613@gaia>
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 10:51 AM Catalin Marinas
<catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 11:20:08PM +0100, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > There's a config option CONFIG_KASAN_STACK that has to be enabled for
> > KASAN to use stack instrumentation and perform validity checks for
> > stack variables.
> >
> > There's no need to unpoison stack when CONFIG_KASAN_STACK is not enabled.
> > Only call kasan_unpoison_task_stack[_below]() when CONFIG_KASAN_STACK is
> > enabled.
> >
> > Note, that CONFIG_KASAN_STACK is an option that is currently always
> > defined when CONFIG_KASAN is enabled, and therefore has to be tested
> > with #if instead of #ifdef.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
> > Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/If8a891e9fe01ea543e00b576852685afec0887e3
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S | 2 +-
> > arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S | 2 +-
> > include/linux/kasan.h | 10 ++++++----
> > mm/kasan/common.c | 2 ++
> > 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S
> > index ba40d57757d6..bdadfa56b40e 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S
> > @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(_cpu_resume)
> > */
> > bl cpu_do_resume
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_KASAN) && CONFIG_KASAN_STACK
> > mov x0, sp
> > bl kasan_unpoison_task_stack_below
> > #endif
>
> I don't understand why CONFIG_KASAN_STACK is not a bool (do you plan to
> add more values to it?) but for arm64:
I don't remember if there's an actual reason. Perhaps this is
something that can be reworked later, but I don't want to get into
this in this series.
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-12 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-10 22:20 [PATCH v2 00/20] kasan: boot parameters for hardware tag-based mode Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-10 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] kasan: simplify quarantine_put call site Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 16:08 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-10 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] kasan: rename get_alloc/free_info Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 16:09 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-10 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] kasan: introduce set_alloc_info Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 16:10 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-10 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] kasan, arm64: unpoison stack only with CONFIG_KASAN_STACK Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 16:13 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-12 9:51 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-12 19:38 ` Andrey Konovalov [this message]
2020-11-10 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] kasan: allow VMAP_STACK for HW_TAGS mode Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 16:20 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-12 0:24 ` Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-12 10:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-10 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] kasan: remove __kasan_unpoison_stack Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 16:42 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-10 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] kasan: inline kasan_reset_tag for tag-based modes Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 16:54 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-10 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] kasan: inline random_tag for HW_TAGS Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 17:02 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-12 0:21 ` Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-10 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] kasan: inline kasan_poison_memory and check_invalid_free Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 17:50 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-10 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] kasan: inline and rename kasan_unpoison_memory Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 17:49 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-12 19:45 ` Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-12 19:52 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-12 20:54 ` Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-12 22:20 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-10 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] kasan: add and integrate kasan boot parameters Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 18:29 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-12 19:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-12 11:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-12 11:53 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-12 12:54 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-12 19:52 ` Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-13 17:52 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-13 17:55 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-10 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] kasan, mm: check kasan_enabled in annotations Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 14:48 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-12 0:36 ` Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-10 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] kasan: simplify kasan_poison_kfree Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 18:42 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-10 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] kasan, mm: rename kasan_poison_kfree Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 18:53 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-12 1:05 ` Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-10 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] kasan: don't round_up too much Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 19:08 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-10 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 16/20] kasan: simplify assign_tag and set_tag calls Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 19:17 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-10 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 17/20] kasan: clarify comment in __kasan_kfree_large Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 19:18 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-10 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 18/20] kasan: clean up metadata allocation and usage Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 23:06 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-12 20:11 ` Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-10 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 19/20] kasan, mm: allow cache merging with no metadata Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 15:13 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-12 23:00 ` Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 23:27 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-10 22:20 ` [PATCH v2 20/20] kasan: update documentation Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-11 16:03 ` Marco Elver
2020-11-12 0:51 ` Andrey Konovalov
2020-11-10 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 00/20] kasan: boot parameters for hardware tag-based mode Andrey Konovalov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAeHK+wfzSjha_M88adfSE3qiOhJcCYeaAAu3YRXHpKqAK2L4Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=Branislav.Rankov@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=eugenis@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).