From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [mm/page_alloc or mm/vmscan or mm/zswap] use-after-free in obj_malloc()
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 18:27:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkZZ+eU0M9GPcWmx2NmxRuJ0ZN9yM=Yi2URUaAxUd-YUcg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d041ca52-8e0b-48b3-9606-314ac2a53408@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 6:10 PM Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
>
> I can observe this bug during evict_folios() from 6.7.0 to 6.8.0-rc5-00163-gffd2cb6b718e.
> Since I haven't observed with 6.6.0, this bug might be introduced in 6.7 cycle.
I am not familiar with KMSAN bug reports, but it seems like it's
reporting a user-after-free for zspage->freeobj. The report says it
was created in free_unref_page_prepare() during lruvec reclaim, and I
am not sure how that's possible given that zspage is allocated from
the slab allocator. Perhaps I am mis-interpreting the report.
I also don't see any recent changes in mm/zsmalloc.c that modify this
code, so maybe it wasn't introduce in 6.7. I will defer to Minchan and
Sergey, I don't think zswap is an active actor in this bug report.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-23 2:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-23 2:10 [mm/page_alloc or mm/vmscan or mm/zswap] use-after-free in obj_malloc() Tetsuo Handa
2024-02-23 2:27 ` Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2024-02-23 4:48 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-02-23 4:50 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-02-23 4:56 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-02-23 4:58 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-02-23 5:05 ` Yosry Ahmed
2024-02-23 5:19 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-02-23 5:23 ` Chengming Zhou
2024-02-23 5:29 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-02-23 9:26 ` Tetsuo Handa
2024-02-23 10:10 ` Chengming Zhou
2024-02-23 4:43 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2024-02-23 15:22 ` Tetsuo Handa
2024-02-23 23:54 ` [PATCH] x86: disable non-instrumented version of copy_page when KMSAN is enabled Tetsuo Handa
2024-02-24 6:27 ` [PATCH v2] " Tetsuo Handa
2024-02-24 14:23 ` [mm/page_alloc or mm/vmscan or mm/zswap] use-after-free in obj_malloc() Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJD7tkZZ+eU0M9GPcWmx2NmxRuJ0ZN9yM=Yi2URUaAxUd-YUcg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=yosryahmed@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=nphamcs@gmail.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).