From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AFFE8E0002 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 07:08:03 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id l17so1583782wme.1 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 04:08:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mo6-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de. [2a01:238:20a:202:5301::7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 128si27176498wmd.69.2019.01.18.04.08.01 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 18 Jan 2019 04:08:01 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: use generic DMA mapping code in powerpc V4 References: <075f70e3-7a4a-732f-b501-05a1a8e3c853@xenosoft.de> <21f72a6a-9095-7034-f169-95e876228b2a@xenosoft.de> <27148ac2-2a92-5536-d886-2c0971ab43d9@xenosoft.de> <20190115133558.GA29225@lst.de> <685f0c06-af1b-0bec-ac03-f9bf1f7a2b35@xenosoft.de> <20190115151732.GA2325@lst.de> <20190118083539.GA30479@lst.de> <871403f2-fa7d-de15-89eb-070432e15c69@xenosoft.de> <20190118112842.GA9115@lst.de> From: Christian Zigotzky Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 13:07:54 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190118112842.GA9115@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: de-DE Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Darren Stevens , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Julian Margetson , linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Paul Mackerras , Olof Johansson , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org git clone git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/misc.git -b powerpc-dma.6 a git checkout 257002094bc5935dd63207a380d9698ab81f0775 I get the following error message with your patch: patching file a/kernel/dma/direct.c Hunk #1 FAILED at 118. Hunk #2 FAILED at 139. 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file a/kernel/dma/direct.c.rej -- Christian On 18 January 2019 at 12:28PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:10:26PM +0100, Christian Zigotzky wrote: >> For which commit? > On top of 257002094bc5935dd63207a380d9698ab81f0775, that is the first > one you identified as breaking the detection of the SATA disks. >