linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	HORIGUCHI NAOYA <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/8] hugetlb: recompute min_count when dropping hugetlb_lock
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:07:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a7d90d58-fa6a-7fa1-77c9-a08515746018@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YFikrdN6DHQSEm6a@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On 3/22/21 7:07 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 19-03-21 15:42:03, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>> The routine set_max_huge_pages reduces the number of hugetlb_pages,
>> by calling free_pool_huge_page in a loop.  It does this as long as
>> persistent_huge_pages() is above a calculated min_count value.
>> However, this loop can conditionally drop hugetlb_lock and in some
>> circumstances free_pool_huge_page can drop hugetlb_lock.  If the
>> lock is dropped, counters could change the calculated min_count
>> value may no longer be valid.
> 
> OK, this one looks like a real bug fix introduced by 55f67141a8927.
> Unless I am missing something we could release pages which are reserved
> already.
>  
>> The routine try_to_free_low has the same issue.
>>
>> Recalculate min_count in each loop iteration as hugetlb_lock may have
>> been dropped.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
>> ---
>>  mm/hugetlb.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> index d5be25f910e8..c537274c2a38 100644
>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> @@ -2521,11 +2521,20 @@ static void __init report_hugepages(void)
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> +static inline unsigned long min_hp_count(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long min_count;
>> +
>> +	min_count = h->resv_huge_pages + h->nr_huge_pages - h->free_huge_pages;
>> +	return max(count, min_count);
> 
> Just out of curiousity, is compiler allowed to inline this piece of code
> and then cache the value? In other words do we need to make these
> READ_ONCE or otherwise enforce the no-caching behavior?

I honestly do not know if the compiler is allowed to do that.  The
assembly code generated by my compiler does not cache the value, but
that does not guarantee anything.  I can add READ_ONCE to make the
function look something like:

static inline unsigned long min_hp_count(struct hstate *h, unsigned long count)
{
	unsigned long min_count;

	min_count = READ_ONCE(h->resv_huge_pages) + READ_ONCE(h->nr_huge_pages)
					- READ_ONCE(h->free_huge_pages);
	return max(count, min_count);
}

-- 
Mike Kravetz


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-22 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-19 22:42 [RFC PATCH 0/8] make hugetlb put_page safe for all calling contexts Mike Kravetz
2021-03-19 22:42 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] hugetlb: add per-hstate mutex to synchronize user adjustments Mike Kravetz
2021-03-22 13:59   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-22 16:57     ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-23  7:48       ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-19 22:42 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] hugetlb: recompute min_count when dropping hugetlb_lock Mike Kravetz
2021-03-22 14:07   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-22 23:07     ` Mike Kravetz [this message]
2021-03-23  7:50       ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-23  8:01         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-23  8:14           ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-23 23:18             ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-24  8:36               ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-24 16:43                 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-19 22:42 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] hugetlb: create remove_hugetlb_page() to separate functionality Mike Kravetz
2021-03-22 14:15   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-22 17:01     ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-19 22:42 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] hugetlb: call update_and_free_page without hugetlb_lock Mike Kravetz
2021-03-22 14:19   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-19 22:42 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] hugetlb: change free_pool_huge_page to remove_pool_huge_page Mike Kravetz
2021-03-22 14:31   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-22 23:28     ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-23  7:57       ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-24  1:03         ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-24  8:40           ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-24 16:38             ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-24 16:50               ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-19 22:42 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] hugetlb: make free_huge_page irq safe Mike Kravetz
2021-03-21 19:55   ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-22 13:36   ` [hugetlb] cd190f60f9: BUG:sleeping_function_called_from_invalid_context_at_mm/hugetlb.c kernel test robot
2021-03-22 14:35   ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] hugetlb: make free_huge_page irq safe Michal Hocko
2021-03-19 22:42 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] hugetlb: add update_and_free_page_no_sleep for irq context Mike Kravetz
2021-03-20  1:18   ` Hillf Danton
2021-03-25  0:26     ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-22  8:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-22 17:42     ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-22 18:10       ` Roman Gushchin
2021-03-23 18:51         ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-23 19:07           ` Roman Gushchin
2021-03-24  8:43           ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-24 16:53             ` Mike Kravetz
2021-03-22 20:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-22 14:42   ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-22 14:46     ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-19 22:42 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] hugetlb: track hugetlb pages allocated via cma_alloc Mike Kravetz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a7d90d58-fa6a-7fa1-77c9-a08515746018@oracle.com \
    --to=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=almasrymina@google.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).