From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail143.messagelabs.com (mail143.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 926926005A4 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 17:01:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 15:59:45 -0600 (CST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/8] Speculative pagefault -v3 In-Reply-To: <4B42606F.3000906@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <20100104182429.833180340@chello.nl> <4B42606F.3000906@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: Rik van Riel Cc: Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E. McKenney" , Peter Zijlstra , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "minchan.kim@gmail.com" , "hugh.dickins" , Nick Piggin , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds List-ID: On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, Rik van Riel wrote: > Fun, but why do we need this? > > What improvements did you measure? If it measures up to Kame-sans approach then the possible pagefault rate will at least double ... -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org