linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zaslonko Mikhail <zaslonko@linux.bm.com>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com,
	schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm, memory_hotplug: Initialize struct pages for the full memory section
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 16:17:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e23ad186-31d4-176d-7330-8c22378891ee@linux.bm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181211094938.3mykr3n3tp6rfz4p@master>



On 11.12.2018 10:49, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 02:24:51PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Mon 10-12-18 14:07:12, Mikhail Zaslonko wrote:
>>> If memory end is not aligned with the sparse memory section boundary, the
>>> mapping of such a section is only partly initialized.
>>
>> It would be great to mention how you can end up in the situation like
>> this(a user provided memmap or a strange HW). 
>>
>>> This may lead to
>>> VM_BUG_ON due to uninitialized struct page access from
>>> is_mem_section_removable() or test_pages_in_a_zone() function triggered by
>>> memory_hotplug sysfs handlers:
>>>
>>>  page:000003d082008000 is uninitialized and poisoned
>>>  page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(p))
>>>  Call Trace:
>>>  ([<0000000000385b26>] test_pages_in_a_zone+0xde/0x160)
>>>   [<00000000008f15c4>] show_valid_zones+0x5c/0x190
>>>   [<00000000008cf9c4>] dev_attr_show+0x34/0x70
>>>   [<0000000000463ad0>] sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xc8/0x148
>>>   [<00000000003e4194>] seq_read+0x204/0x480
>>>   [<00000000003b53ea>] __vfs_read+0x32/0x178
>>>   [<00000000003b55b2>] vfs_read+0x82/0x138
>>>   [<00000000003b5be2>] ksys_read+0x5a/0xb0
>>>   [<0000000000b86ba0>] system_call+0xdc/0x2d8
>>>  Last Breaking-Event-Address:
>>>   [<0000000000385b26>] test_pages_in_a_zone+0xde/0x160
>>>  Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops
>>>
>>> Fix the problem by initializing the last memory section of the highest zone
>>> in memmap_init_zone() till the very end, even if it goes beyond the zone
>>> end.
>>
>> Why do we need to restrict this to the highest zone? In other words, why
>> cannot we do what I was suggesting earlier [1]. What does prevent other
>> zones to have an incomplete section boundary?
>>
>> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181105183533.GQ4361@dhcp22.suse.cz
>>
> 
> I tried to go through the original list and make myself familiar with
> the bug.
> 
> Confused why initialize the *last* end_pfn could fix this, since
> is_mem_section_removable() will iterate on each page of a section. This
> means we need to initialize all the pages left in the section.
That's exactly what the fix does. We initialize all the pages left in 
the section.

> 
> One way to fix this in my mind is to record the last pfn in mem_section.
Do you mean last initialized pfn? I guess we have agreed upon that the 
entire section should be initialized.  

> This could be done in memory_preset(), since after that we may assume
> the section is full. Not sure whether you would like it.
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-11 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-10 13:07 [PATCH 0/1] Initialize struct pages for the full section Mikhail Zaslonko
2018-12-10 13:07 ` [PATCH 1/1] mm, memory_hotplug: Initialize struct pages for the full memory section Mikhail Zaslonko
2018-12-10 13:24   ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-10 15:45     ` Zaslonko Mikhail
2018-12-10 18:19       ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-11 15:18         ` Zaslonko Mikhail
2018-12-11  9:49     ` Wei Yang
2018-12-11 15:17       ` Zaslonko Mikhail [this message]
2018-12-11 22:24         ` Wei Yang
2018-12-10 15:10   ` Wei Yang
2018-12-10 16:14     ` Zaslonko Mikhail
2018-12-11  1:50       ` Wei Yang
2018-12-11 15:23         ` Zaslonko Mikhail
2018-12-11 22:14           ` Wei Yang
2018-12-10 21:09   ` Sasha Levin
2019-06-14 21:56   ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e23ad186-31d4-176d-7330-8c22378891ee@linux.bm.com \
    --to=zaslonko@linux.bm.com \
    --cc=Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=zaslonko@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).