linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Very slow unlockall()
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 19:00:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e6f84b27-ed29-0fa4-e466-536b529c5720@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9474cd07-676a-56ed-1942-5090e0b9a82f@suse.cz>

On 01/02/2021 14:08, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 1/8/21 3:39 PM, Milan Broz wrote:
>> On 08/01/2021 14:41, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Wed 06-01-21 16:20:15, Milan Broz wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> we use mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE) / munlockall() in cryptsetup code
>>>> and someone tried to use it with hardened memory allocator library.
>>>>
>>>> Execution time was increased to extreme (minutes) and as we found, the problem
>>>> is in munlockall().
>>>>
>>>> Here is a plain reproducer for the core without any external code - it takes
>>>> unlocking on Fedora rawhide kernel more than 30 seconds!
>>>> I can reproduce it on 5.10 kernels and Linus' git.
>>>>
>>>> The reproducer below tries to mmap large amount memory with PROT_NONE (later never used).
>>>> The real code of course does something more useful but the problem is the same.
>>>>
>>>> #include <stdio.h>
>>>> #include <stdlib.h>
>>>> #include <fcntl.h>
>>>> #include <sys/mman.h>
>>>>
>>>> int main (int argc, char *argv[])
>>>> {
>>>>         void *p  = mmap(NULL, 1UL << 41, PROT_NONE, MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
>>>>
>>>>         if (p == MAP_FAILED) return 1;
>>>>
>>>>         if (mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE)) return 1;
>>>>         printf("locked\n");
>>>>
>>>>         if (munlockall()) return 1;
>>>>         printf("unlocked\n");
>>>>
>>>>         return 0;
>>>> }

...

>> Today's Linus git - 5.11.0-rc2+ in my testing x86_64 VM (no extensive kernel debug options):
>>
>> # time ./lock
>> locked
>> unlocked
>>
>> real    0m4.172s
>> user    0m0.000s
>> sys     0m4.172s
> 
> The perf report would be more interesting from this configuration.

ok, I cannot run perf on that particular VM but tried the latest Fedora stable
kernel without debug options  - 5.10.12-200.fc33.x86_64

This is the report running reproducer above:

time:
real    0m6.123s
user    0m0.099s
sys     0m5.310s

perf:

# Total Lost Samples: 0
#
# Samples: 20K of event 'cycles'
# Event count (approx.): 20397603279
#
# Overhead  Command  Shared Object      Symbol                      
# ........  .......  .................  ............................
#
    47.26%  lock     [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] follow_page_mask
    20.43%  lock     [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] munlock_vma_pages_range
    15.92%  lock     [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] follow_page
     7.40%  lock     [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] rcu_all_qs
     5.87%  lock     [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] _cond_resched
     3.08%  lock     [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] follow_huge_addr
     0.01%  lock     [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] __update_load_avg_cfs_rq
     0.01%  lock     [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] ____fput
     0.01%  lock     [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] rmap_walk_file
     0.00%  lock     [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] page_mapped
     0.00%  lock     [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] native_irq_return_iret
     0.00%  lock     [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] _raw_spin_lock_irq
     0.00%  lock     [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] perf_iterate_ctx
     0.00%  lock     [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] finish_task_switch
     0.00%  perf     [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] native_sched_clock
     0.00%  lock     [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] native_write_msr
     0.00%  perf     [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] native_write_msr


m.


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-01 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-06 15:20 Very slow unlockall() Milan Broz
2021-01-08 13:41 ` Michal Hocko
2021-01-08 14:39   ` Milan Broz
2021-01-31 17:22     ` Milan Broz
2021-02-01 13:08     ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-02-01 18:00       ` Milan Broz [this message]
2021-02-01 18:55         ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-02-01 19:19           ` Milan Broz
2021-02-10 15:18             ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-02-10 16:57               ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-10 17:40                 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-11  5:21                   ` Hugh Dickins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e6f84b27-ed29-0fa4-e466-536b529c5720@gmail.com \
    --to=gmazyland@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).