From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: "russianneuromancer @ ya . ru" <russianneuromancer@ya.ru>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Disable 1.8V modes on external microSD on Lenovo Miix 320
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:31:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93446e09-5f12-800a-62fa-bf3ecea7273d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84a32714-ba08-74a0-0c76-3c36db44dd68@intel.com>
Hi,
On 15-01-2020 14:48, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 15/01/20 3:31 pm, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 15-01-2020 13:57, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>> On 8/01/20 11:39 am, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> Based on a sample of 7 DSDTs from Cherry Trail devices using an AXP288
>>>> PMIC depending on the design one of 2 possible LDOs on the PMIC is used
>>>> for the MMC signalling voltage, either DLDO3 or GPIO1LDO (GPIO1 pin in
>>>> low noise LDO mode).
>>>>
>>>> The Lenovo Miix 320-10ICR uses GPIO1LDO in the SHC1 ACPI device's DSM
>>>> methods to set 3.3 or 1.8 signalling voltage and this appears to work
>>>> as advertised, so presumably the device is actually using GPIO1LDO for
>>>> the external microSD signalling voltage.
>>>>
>>>> But this device has a bug in the _PS0 method of the SHC1 ACPI device,
>>>> the DSM remembers the last set signalling voltage and the _PS0 restores
>>>> this after a (runtime) suspend-resume cycle, but it "restores" the voltage
>>>> on DLDO3 instead of setting it on GPIO1LDO as the DSM method does. DLDO3
>>>> is used for the LCD and setting it to 1.8V causes the LCD to go black.
>>>>
>>>> This issue can be worked around by setting the SDHCI_QUIRK2_NO_1_8_V
>>>> quirk on the sdhci_host so that the DSM never gets used to program the
>>>> signalling voltage to 1.8V.
>>>
>>> Could you instead call the 3.3V DSM at runtime suspend time, then the _PS0
>>> would not "restore" the 1.8V value? That should allow you to use 1.8V UHS-I
>>> speed modes with SD cards that support them.
>>
>> I have considered doing this, but this means reprogramming the signal
>> voltage to 3.3V at a time when the card does not expect this, is this ok?
>
> The host controller does not runtime suspend unless the card is runtime
> suspended, so the bus power should be off.
>
>>
>> We would then also need to recall the DSM to put the voltage back to 1.8V
>> from resume.
>
> No, the card will be reinitialized at 3.3V and switch back to 1.8V.
>
>> I have a feeling that this is probably what Windows does
>> (I guess it moves the entire card back to a more safe IOS mode before
>> suspend), accidentally avoiding the bug.
>>
>> I assume you want to only call the DSM to set the voltage to 3.3V on
>> the affected model, or do you want to do this on all machines ?
>
> I would stick with the specific machine for now.
Ok I will give this a try. Hopefully I can make some time for this the
coming days.
>> Adding this does seem to introduce more complexity then simply disabling
>> 1.8V modes and given that it is just a single model which is affected
>> I went with the more simple option of just disabling the 1.8V modes.
>>
>> Ideally we would not need any quirks, but if we do we should at least
>> make the work-around as simple as possible. So I've a slight preference
>> for just sticking with DHCI_QUIRK2_NO_1_8_V ...
>>
>> Note that the suspend/resume handling is broken also in the sense that
>> it does not disable the signal voltage during suspend.
>
> The bus power gets switched off if the card is runtime suspended. The host
> controller should go to D3cold which means everything off.
Right, what I mean is that the _PS3 method is broken in that it does
not turn off the voltage-regulator providing the signal voltage, as
it does do on other machines with a non buggy implementation.
>>>> So far we have mostly been able to avoid using device specific quirks in
>>>> the sdhci-acpi code, but given that this issue is specific to this one
>>>> model and we certainly do not want to disable 1.8V modes everywhere I
>>>> see no other option.
>>>>
>>>> This commit adds a new mechanism for setting sdhci-acpi specific quirks
>>>> and a matching sdhci-acpi.quirks module parameter to make testing quirks /
>>>> similar issues on other devices easier.
>>>>
>>>> The first quirk supported by this mechanism is SDHCI_ACPI_QUIRK_SD_NO_1_8V,
>>>> which when set causes any slots with the SDHCI_ACPI_SD_CD flag to get the
>>>> SDHCI_QUIRK2_NO_1_8_V quirk set on their sdhci_host.
>>>>
>>>> This commit also adds a DMI table for specifying default quirks for some
>>>> models and adds an entry for the Lenovo Miix 320-10ICR which enables the
>>>> SDHCI_QUIRK2_NO_1_8_V by default on this model, fixing the LCD going black
>>>> when the external microSD slot is used.
>>>>
>>>> BugLink: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111294
>>>> BugLink: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/355
>>>> Reported-by: russianneuromancer <russianneuromancer@ya.ru>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
>>>> index 105e73d4a3b9..9f150c73e958 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-acpi.c
>>>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>>>> #include <linux/pm.h>
>>>> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>>>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/dmi.h>
>>>> #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
>>>> #include <linux/mmc/pm.h>
>>>> @@ -75,6 +76,14 @@ struct sdhci_acpi_host {
>>>> unsigned long private[0] ____cacheline_aligned;
>>>> };
>>>> +enum {
>>>> + SDHCI_ACPI_QUIRK_SD_NO_1_8V = BIT(0),
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static int quirks = -1;
>>>> +module_param(quirks, int, 0444);
>>>> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(quirks, "Override sdhci-acpi specific quirks");
>>>
>>> Why is a module parameter needed?
>>
>> The module parameter is purely to make testing if the same quirk(s)
>> help on other devices easier. Like the debug_quirks[2] params in sdhci.c
>
> Mmm, but we already have SDHCI_QUIRK2_NO_1_8_V
True, but this only applies to the sdcard slot and not to the eMMC,
also you are asking for this to be changed to:
SDHCI_ACPI_QUIRK_SD_SET_SIGNAL_3_3V_ON_SUSPEND
Which is not duplicate. Anyways if you dislike the module parameter
bits I can drop them and make this only available through the DMI quirks.
Regards,
Hans
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>>
>>
>>
>>>> +
>>>> static inline void *sdhci_acpi_priv(struct sdhci_acpi_host *c)
>>>> {
>>>> return (void *)c->private;
>>>> @@ -647,6 +656,24 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id sdhci_acpi_ids[] = {
>>>> };
>>>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, sdhci_acpi_ids);
>>>> +static const struct dmi_system_id sdhci_acpi_quirks[] = {
>>>> + {
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * The Lenovo Miix 320-10ICR has a bug in the _PS0 method of
>>>> + * the SHC1 ACPI device, this bug causes it to reprogram the
>>>> + * wrong LDO (DLDO3) to 1.8V if 1.8V modes are used and the
>>>> + * card is (runtime) suspended + resumed. DLDO3 is used for
>>>> + * the LCD and setting it to 1.8V causes the LCD to go black.
>>>> + */
>>>> + .matches = {
>>>> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "LENOVO"),
>>>> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION, "Lenovo MIIX 320-10ICR"),
>>>> + },
>>>> + .driver_data = (void *)SDHCI_ACPI_QUIRK_SD_NO_1_8V,
>>>> + },
>>>> + {} /* Terminating entry */
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> static const struct sdhci_acpi_slot *sdhci_acpi_get_slot(struct
>>>> acpi_device *adev)
>>>> {
>>>> const struct sdhci_acpi_uid_slot *u;
>>>> @@ -663,6 +690,7 @@ static int sdhci_acpi_probe(struct platform_device
>>>> *pdev)
>>>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>> const struct sdhci_acpi_slot *slot;
>>>> struct acpi_device *device, *child;
>>>> + const struct dmi_system_id *id;
>>>> struct sdhci_acpi_host *c;
>>>> struct sdhci_host *host;
>>>> struct resource *iomem;
>>>> @@ -670,6 +698,14 @@ static int sdhci_acpi_probe(struct platform_device
>>>> *pdev)
>>>> size_t priv_size;
>>>> int err;
>>>> + if (quirks == -1) {
>>>> + id = dmi_first_match(sdhci_acpi_quirks);
>>>> + if (id)
>>>> + quirks = (long)id->driver_data;
>>>> + else
>>>> + quirks = 0;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> device = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
>>>> if (!device)
>>>> return -ENODEV;
>>>> @@ -759,6 +795,9 @@ static int sdhci_acpi_probe(struct platform_device
>>>> *pdev)
>>>> dev_warn(dev, "failed to setup card detect gpio\n");
>>>> c->use_runtime_pm = false;
>>>> }
>>>> +
>>>> + if (quirks & SDHCI_ACPI_QUIRK_SD_NO_1_8V)
>>>> + host->quirks2 |= SDHCI_QUIRK2_NO_1_8_V;
>>>> }
>>>> err = sdhci_setup_host(host);
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-15 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-08 9:39 [PATCH 0/2] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Introduce device specific quirks, fix issues on 2 device models Hans de Goede
2020-01-08 9:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Disable 1.8V modes on external microSD on Lenovo Miix 320 Hans de Goede
2020-01-15 12:57 ` Adrian Hunter
2020-01-15 13:31 ` Hans de Goede
2020-01-15 13:48 ` Adrian Hunter
2020-01-15 15:31 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2020-01-16 7:59 ` Adrian Hunter
2020-01-16 11:05 ` [FSL P5020 P5040 PPC] Onboard SD card doesn't work anymore after the 'mmc-v5.4-2' updates Christian Zigotzky
2020-01-16 15:46 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-01-20 9:17 ` Christian Zigotzky
2020-01-20 11:18 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-01-24 11:42 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-01-25 13:26 ` Christian Zigotzky
2020-01-28 11:55 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-01-28 7:58 ` [PASEMI PA6T PPC] Onboard CF card device with new SanDisk High (>8G) CF cards Christian Zigotzky
2020-01-28 8:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-28 14:16 ` Rob Herring
2020-01-28 14:48 ` Christian Zigotzky
2020-01-16 13:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Disable 1.8V modes on external microSD on Lenovo Miix 320 Hans de Goede
2020-01-17 9:16 ` Adrian Hunter
2020-03-06 14:07 ` Hans de Goede
2020-03-06 14:10 ` Hans de Goede
2020-01-08 9:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Disable write protect detection on Acer Aspire Switch 10 (SW5-012) Hans de Goede
2020-01-15 12:51 ` [PATCH 0/2] mmc: sdhci-acpi: Introduce device specific quirks, fix issues on 2 device models Adrian Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93446e09-5f12-800a-62fa-bf3ecea7273d@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=russianneuromancer@ya.ru \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).