linux-mmc.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix issues with command queuing in arasan controllers
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 17:34:34 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b34a07a7-8814-f1dd-3a90-5009af6b9eeb@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c74c1b9-8ae4-49be-68e3-8e827d07cc66@intel.com>

Hi Adrian,

On 08/01/20 5:29 pm, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 8/01/20 1:49 pm, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>> Adrian,
>>
>> On 08/01/20 5:12 pm, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>> On 8/01/20 1:30 pm, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 30/12/19 2:53 pm, Faiz Abbas wrote:
>>>>> In some Arasan SDHCI controllers, after tuning, the tuning pattern data
>>>>> is leftover in the sdhci buffer. This leads to issues with future data
>>>>> commands, especially when command queuing is enabled. The following
>>>>> patches help fix this issue by resetting data lines after tuning is
>>>>> finished. The first two patches have been tested with TI's am65x and
>>>>> j721e SoCs using the sdhci_am654 driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a strong suspicion that this is the same issue with
>>>>> the sdhci-of-arasan driver where they are forced to dump data from the
>>>>> buffer before enabling command queuing. I need help from someone with a
>>>>> compatible platform to test this.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I had some discussions with our hardware team and they say we should be
>>>> asserting both SRC and SRD reset after tuning to start from a clean
>>>> state. Will update the patches to do that in v2.
>>>
>>> Can you use the ->execute_tuning() for that instead of a quirk?
>>>
>>
>> ->platform_execute_tuning() is called before __sdhci_execute_tuning(). I
>> need this to be done after that. Should I add a post_tuning() callback?
> 
> I meant hook host->mmc_host_ops.execute_tuning and call
> sdhci_execute_tuning() and then sdhci_reset(), like in intel_execute_tuning().
> 

Ok. Makes sense.

Thanks,
Faiz

      reply	other threads:[~2020-01-08 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-30  9:23 [PATCH 0/3] Fix issues with command queuing in arasan controllers Faiz Abbas
2019-12-30  9:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] mmc: sdhci: Add Quirk to reset data lines after tuning Faiz Abbas
2019-12-30  9:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci_am654: Enable Quirk to reset data " Faiz Abbas
2019-12-30  9:23 ` [RFT PATCH 3/3] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Fix Command Queuing enable handling Faiz Abbas
2020-01-03  0:36   ` Shawn Lin
2020-01-08 11:30 ` [PATCH 0/3] Fix issues with command queuing in arasan controllers Faiz Abbas
2020-01-08 11:42   ` Adrian Hunter
2020-01-08 11:49     ` Faiz Abbas
2020-01-08 11:59       ` Adrian Hunter
2020-01-08 12:04         ` Faiz Abbas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b34a07a7-8814-f1dd-3a90-5009af6b9eeb@ti.com \
    --to=faiz_abbas@ti.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).