[PATCH v4 2/7] mtd: onenand: Store bad block marker position in chip struct

From: Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
To: "bbrezillon@kernel.org" <bbrezillon@kernel.org>,
	"miquel.raynal@bootlin.com" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	"richard@nod.at" <richard@nod.at>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	"Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Schrempf Frieder <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/7] mtd: onenand: Store bad block marker position in chip struct
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:42:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190218104122.18788-3-frieder.schrempf@kontron.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190218104122.18788-1-frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>

From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>

The information about where the manufacturer puts the bad block
markers inside the bad block and in the OOB data is stored in
different places. Let's move this information to the chip struct,
as we did it for rawnand.

Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c | 5 ++++-
 drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c  | 3 ---
 include/linux/mtd/onenand.h             | 3 +++
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c
index 4ca4b194e7d7..f41d76248550 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_base.c
@@ -2458,7 +2458,7 @@ static int onenand_default_block_markbad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs)
                 bbm->bbt[block >> 2] |= 0x01 << ((block & 0x03) << 1);
 
         /* We write two bytes, so we don't have to mess with 16-bit access */
-        ofs += mtd->oobsize + (bbm->badblockpos & ~0x01);
+        ofs += mtd->oobsize + (this->badblockpos & ~0x01);
 	/* FIXME : What to do when marking SLC block in partition
 	 * 	   with MLC erasesize? For now, it is not advisable to
 	 *	   create partitions containing both SLC and MLC regions.
@@ -3967,6 +3967,9 @@ int onenand_scan(struct mtd_info *mtd, int maxchips)
 	if (!(this->options & ONENAND_SKIP_INITIAL_UNLOCKING))
 		this->unlock_all(mtd);
 
+	/* Set the bad block marker position */
+	this->badblockpos = ONENAND_BADBLOCK_POS;
+
 	ret = this->scan_bbt(mtd);
 	if ((!FLEXONENAND(this)) || ret)
 		return ret;
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c
index dde20487937d..57c31c81be18 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/onenand_bbt.c
@@ -190,9 +190,6 @@ static int onenand_scan_bbt(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_bbt_descr *bd)
 	if (!bbm->bbt)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	/* Set the bad block position */
-	bbm->badblockpos = ONENAND_BADBLOCK_POS;
-
 	/* Set erase shift */
 	bbm->bbt_erase_shift = this->erase_shift;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/onenand.h b/include/linux/mtd/onenand.h
index 0aaa98b219a4..e03aea7f7e61 100644
--- a/include/linux/mtd/onenand.h
+++ b/include/linux/mtd/onenand.h
@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ struct onenand_chip {
 	unsigned int		technology;
 	unsigned int		density_mask;
 	unsigned int		options;
+	int			badblockpos;
 
 	unsigned int		erase_shift;
 	unsigned int		page_shift;
@@ -188,6 +189,8 @@ struct onenand_chip {
 /* Check byte access in OneNAND */
 #define ONENAND_CHECK_BYTE_ACCESS(addr)		(addr & 0x1)
 
+#define ONENAND_BADBLOCK_POS		0
+
 /*
  * Options bits
  */
-- 
2.17.1

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
