From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
yi zhang <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix a potential space leak problem while linking tmpfile
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 20:36:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <963fa5c8-414f-783f-871e-47e751b54d87@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463101229.103384.1594123741187.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
在 2020/7/7 20:09, Richard Weinberger 写道:
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>> Perhaps I misunderstood what commit 32fe905c17f001 ("ubifs: Fix
>> O_TMPFILE corner case in ubifs_link()") wanted to fix.
>> I think orphan area is used to remind filesystem don't forget to delete
>> inodes (whose nlink is 0) in next unclean rebooting. Generally, the file
>> system is not corrupted caused by replaying orphan nodes.
>> Ralph reported a filesystem corruption in combination with overlayfs.
>> Can you tell me the details about that problem? Thanks.
> On my test bed I didn't see a fs corruption, what I saw was a failing orphan
> self test while playing with O_TMPFILE and linkat().
Do we have a reproducer, or can I get the fail testcase? Is it a xfstest
case?
>
> When you create a tmpfile it has a link count of 0 and an orphan is
> installed. Such that the tmpfile is gone after a reboot but you can
> still use it prior to that.
> By using linkat() you can raise the link counter to 1 again.
> Thus, the orphan needs to be removed.
> This is pattern overlayfs uses a lot.
>
> Since UBIFS never supported raising the link counter from 0 to 1
> we have many corner cases and fixing all these turned out into a nightmare.
> ...as you can see from the amount broken patches from me :-(.
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
>
> .
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-07 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-01 11:26 [PATCH] ubifs: Fix a potential space leak problem while linking tmpfile Zhihao Cheng
2020-07-07 11:26 ` Richard Weinberger
2020-07-07 11:54 ` Zhihao Cheng
2020-07-07 12:09 ` Richard Weinberger
2020-07-07 12:36 ` Zhihao Cheng [this message]
2020-07-07 12:47 ` Richard Weinberger
2020-07-11 6:37 ` Zhihao Cheng
2020-07-11 6:44 ` Zhihao Cheng
2020-07-13 3:30 ` Zhihao Cheng
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-07-01 9:32 Zhihao Cheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=963fa5c8-414f-783f-871e-47e751b54d87@huawei.com \
--to=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).