From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: driver-core tree build failure Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:24:11 +1100 Message-ID: <20081119132411.94bcd144.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20081119113031.28e2ae68.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081119132214.681066b4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Wed__19_Nov_2008_13_24_11_+1100_O.poYXfeHZn2iXGq" Return-path: Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:56875 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751479AbYKSCYX (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:24:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081119132214.681066b4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Greg KH Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Kay Sievers --Signature=_Wed__19_Nov_2008_13_24_11_+1100_O.poYXfeHZn2iXGq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:22:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell = wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:40:42 +0100 "Kay Sievers" w= rote: > > > > Is this the only one, or only the first failure you've seen with the > > driver-core tree? Some of the patches we've been unable to test, and > > unfortunately the maintainers didn't respond for weeks now. >=20 > In any case, I assume it will be fixed tomorrow in Greg's tree. And maybe only the tested patches should have been put into Greg's linux-next tree, hmmm? --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Wed__19_Nov_2008_13_24_11_+1100_O.poYXfeHZn2iXGq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkkjeMsACgkQjjKRsyhoI8yXvACdHYo41Jzgsi+EkDUqIDx0t+y7 zxEAn1vPT43Mi6jjj9QAHVfAhFKNIzlc =NoM9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Wed__19_Nov_2008_13_24_11_+1100_O.poYXfeHZn2iXGq--