From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ttydev tree with the usb.current tree
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:26:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090728112608.09a494e0@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090728140110.7cfe7c22.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:01:10 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the ttydev tree got a conflict in
> drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c between commit
> a00b8d98aca97bfb6fa983f41dae25b424058592 ("USB: fix usage count in usb
> serial generic open regarding autoresume") from the usb.current tree
That looks wrong. The extra fiddling with port.count looks both unsafe
and incorrect. I've never seen the "autoresume" patch referred to so I've
no idea what it is trying to do
Greg ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-28 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-28 4:01 linux-next: manual merge of the ttydev tree with the usb.current tree Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-28 10:26 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2009-07-28 12:10 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-07-28 12:29 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-28 12:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-28 13:17 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-28 16:32 ` Greg KH
2009-07-28 16:34 ` Greg KH
2009-07-28 19:21 ` Oliver Neukum
2009-07-28 19:24 ` Alan Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-09 3:04 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-09 23:19 ` Greg KH
2009-07-10 0:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-10 0:13 ` Greg KH
2009-04-23 4:49 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-23 4:34 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-23 4:30 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-22 3:38 Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-22 15:50 ` Alan Stern
2009-04-22 16:30 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-22 16:38 ` Greg KH
2009-04-28 4:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-28 4:58 ` Greg KH
2009-04-28 6:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-12 4:04 Stephen Rothwell
2009-03-12 9:44 ` Alan Cox
2009-03-12 11:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090728112608.09a494e0@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).