From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brown Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the arm tree Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:58:25 -0700 Message-ID: <20110914225825.GA13421@huya.qualcomm.com> References: <20110912120501.764336af05069fa23a371b5e@canb.auug.org.au> <4E6D6C0D.60100@codeaurora.org> <20110913115533.403d4fe6d961ccc8ba9b58b7@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:61700 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750945Ab1INW61 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:58:27 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110913115533.403d4fe6d961ccc8ba9b58b7@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Stephen Boyd , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Brown , Russell King On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:55:33AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:18:53 -0700 Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > The device tree machine description also needs to have the .fixup and > > .reserve callbacks added to it so that the device tree machines boot > > properly. Perhaps the soc tree needs to pull in Russell's tree at some > > point to resolve this subtle logical conflict or when the trees are > > merged together someone will need to do an evil merge and add the > > callbacks in the merge commit. > > Ah, right. I have added this merge fixup for today and can carry it as > necessary. Arnd, how do you want to handle this? It's a simple patch, but only applies to the merge of Russell's tree and the soc tree. Thanks, David -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.