On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 02:08:10PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:

> > > -	for_each_set_bit_cont(i, lzo_blocks[0]->sync_bmp,
> > > +	for_each_set_bit_from(i, lzo_blocks[0]->sync_bmp,

> > That looks about right, yes.  Not sure what the best way to handle this
> > is, perhaps maintain _cont() for a while?

> I don't think that will be needed - for_each_set_bit_cont() only had
> two callers, both in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c.

Well, by "a while" I mostly mean "until after the merge window when the
new API is available".