linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:22:58 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130325152258.b930b51cccd98bedceeca92c@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1311 bytes --]

Hi Andrew,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in
fs/proc/inode.c between commit  ("vfs,proc: guarantee unique inodes
in /proc") from Linus' tree and commit
"procfs-improve-scaling-in-proc-v5" from the akpm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc fs/proc/inode.c
index 38f0775,f53660a..0000000

--- a/fs/proc/inode.c
+++ b/fs/proc/inode.c
@@@ -463,10 -464,10 +464,11 @@@ static const struct file_operations pro
  
  struct inode *proc_get_inode(struct super_block *sb, struct proc_dir_entry *de)
  {
 -	struct inode *inode = iget_locked(sb, de->low_ino);
 +	struct inode *inode = new_inode_pseudo(sb);
+ 	const struct file_operations *fops;
  
 -	if (inode && (inode->i_state & I_NEW)) {
 +	if (inode) {
 +		inode->i_ino = de->low_ino;
  		inode->i_mtime = inode->i_atime = inode->i_ctime = CURRENT_TIME;
  		PROC_I(inode)->pde = de;
  
@@@ -491,9 -494,11 +495,10 @@@
  #endif
  					inode->i_fop = &proc_reg_file_ops;
  			} else {
- 				inode->i_fop = de->proc_fops;
+ 				inode->i_fop = fops;
  			}
  		}
+ 		rcu_read_unlock();
 -		unlock_new_inode(inode);
  	} else
  	       pde_put(de);
  	return inode;

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
