From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: sfr@canb.auug.org.au
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ivecera@redhat.com,
kaber@trash.net
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with Linus' tree
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:41:34 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130422.204134.24585943335801567.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130422124334.92adfce6bdbcba7b08fe83a2@canb.auug.org.au>
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:43:34 +1000
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
> drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c between commit f11a869d4e38
> ("be2net: take care of __vlan_put_tag return value") from Linus' tree and
> commit 86a9bad3ab6b ("net: vlan: add protocol argument to packet tagging
> functions") from the net-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
I took care of this during the net --> net-next merge, thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-23 0:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-22 2:43 linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-23 0:41 ` David Miller [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-12-14 23:52 Stephen Rothwell
2023-02-16 23:40 Stephen Rothwell
2023-02-16 23:18 Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-27 23:28 Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-28 6:53 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-09-21 1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-21 4:40 ` Colin Foster
2022-07-15 2:01 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-15 1:48 Stephen Rothwell
2021-07-23 2:32 Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-29 0:59 Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-29 0:48 Stephen Rothwell
2021-01-29 0:43 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-21 0:07 Stephen Rothwell
2019-09-15 20:31 Mark Brown
2019-09-15 20:24 Mark Brown
2019-06-17 1:44 Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-04 0:30 Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-04 0:29 Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-02 22:56 Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-20 1:49 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-06 4:37 Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-04 22:59 Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-09 23:31 Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-10 4:37 ` Cong Wang
2017-11-10 4:39 ` David Miller
2017-10-30 17:24 Mark Brown
2017-10-30 17:08 Mark Brown
2017-10-30 17:02 Mark Brown
2017-10-30 17:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-10-30 18:10 ` Mark Brown
2017-06-30 0:57 Stephen Rothwell
2017-05-03 1:07 Stephen Rothwell
2017-05-03 4:08 ` David Miller
2017-03-24 0:05 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-24 0:10 ` David Miller
2017-03-24 1:24 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-02-02 1:49 Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-02 8:40 ` Yotam Gigi
2016-10-02 22:37 Stephen Rothwell
2016-10-02 22:32 Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-30 1:01 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-03 3:15 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-15 0:07 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-15 8:53 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2015-07-14 1:46 Stephen Rothwell
2015-07-14 8:23 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2015-05-28 4:17 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-28 13:34 ` Tom Lendacky
2015-02-12 1:05 Stephen Rothwell
2014-06-12 2:01 Stephen Rothwell
2014-06-05 3:13 Stephen Rothwell
2014-06-05 3:26 ` KY Srinivasan
2013-12-18 1:46 Stephen Rothwell
2013-12-18 1:56 ` Jeff Kirsher
2013-12-18 2:19 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-05 5:23 Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-05 5:19 Stephen Rothwell
2013-09-05 7:33 ` Daniel Borkmann
2013-09-02 3:12 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-17 2:44 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-17 2:38 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-22 3:09 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-23 0:42 ` David Miller
2013-04-22 3:03 Stephen Rothwell
2013-04-23 0:41 ` David Miller
2013-04-22 2:48 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-27 0:57 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-27 4:54 ` David Miller
2013-03-12 0:33 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-12 10:49 ` David Miller
2012-11-08 23:53 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-10 23:34 ` David Miller
2012-10-02 1:51 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-26 1:46 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-19 1:15 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-19 1:18 ` Jeff Kirsher
2012-02-27 1:11 Stephen Rothwell
2012-02-27 4:05 ` David Miller
2012-02-29 3:21 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130422.204134.24585943335801567.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).