Hi Andrew,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in fs/dcache.c
between commit 8aab6a27332b ("vfs: reorganize dput() memory accesses")
from Linus' tree and commit "dentry: move to per-sb LRU locks" from the
akpm tree.

I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
(no action is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

diff --cc fs/dcache.c
index 664554e,6e212bd..0000000
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@@ -362,9 -332,8 +361,9 @@@ static void dentry_unlink_inode(struct 
   */
  static void dentry_lru_add(struct dentry *dentry)
  {
 -	if (list_empty(&dentry->d_lru)) {
 +	if (unlikely(!(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_LRU_LIST))) {
- 		spin_lock(&dcache_lru_lock);
+ 		spin_lock(&dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
 +		dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_LRU_LIST;
  		list_add(&dentry->d_lru, &dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru);
  		dentry->d_sb->s_nr_dentry_unused++;
  		this_cpu_inc(nr_dentry_unused);
@@@ -394,9 -363,8 +393,9 @@@ static void dentry_lru_del(struct dentr
  
  static void dentry_lru_move_list(struct dentry *dentry, struct list_head *list)
  {
- 	spin_lock(&dcache_lru_lock);
+ 	spin_lock(&dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
  	if (list_empty(&dentry->d_lru)) {
 +		dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_LRU_LIST;
  		list_add_tail(&dentry->d_lru, list);
  		dentry->d_sb->s_nr_dentry_unused++;
  		this_cpu_inc(nr_dentry_unused);