From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:35:20 -0700 Message-ID: <20130910153520.14e49cd32feb16d45eb8abac@linux-foundation.org> References: <20130910143807.4c32d548e08d2184061f52cb@canb.auug.org.au> <20130910152753.662599171456233c5f91edb4@linux-foundation.org> <20130910222924.GB13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130910222924.GB13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Al Viro Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Dave Chinner List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 23:29:24 +0100 Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:27:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > This is rather a fiasco. "vfs: reorganize dput() memory accesses" made > > rather a mess of a 46 patch series which has been under development and > > test for two cycles so far. > > Check vfs.git#for-next... Why? What is in it?