Hi Andrew,

On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:13:02 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 23:59:34 +0100 Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > It's not that bad, actually; I think the variant I've pushed right now
> > (vfs.git#for-next, head at f5e1dd34561e0fb06400b378d595198918833021) should
> > be doing the right thing.  It ought to cover everything in your branch
> > in -next from "fs: bump inode and dentry counters to long" on to the
> > end of queue.
> 
> That's the correct starting point.  The end point should be
> "staging/lustre/libcfs: cleanup linux-mem.h".

OK, so I have removed that set of patches from the copy of the -mm tree
that is in linux-next today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au