Hi Ingo, On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:26:04 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Thierry Reding wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 08:24:42PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > > > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > > > > > In file included from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/mmzone.h:9:0, > > > from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/gfp.h:4, > > > from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/kmod.h:22, > > > from /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/module.h:13, > > > from /scratch/sfr/next/block/blk-mq.c:2: > > > /scratch/sfr/next/block/blk-mq.c: In function 'blk_mq_queue_enter': > > > /scratch/sfr/next/include/linux/wait.h:772:2: error: expected ';' before '__ret' > > > __ret; \ > > > ^ > > > /scratch/sfr/next/block/blk-mq.c:108:8: note: in expansion of macro 'wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq' > > > ret = wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq(q->mq_freeze_wq, > > > ^ > > > /scratch/sfr/next/block/blk-mq.c:108:6: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be > > > ret = wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq(q->mq_freeze_wq, > > > ^ > > > > > > Caused by commit 35a2af94c7ce ("sched/wait: Make the __wait_event*() > > > interface more friendly"). > > > > > > Since this was also in next-20131025, I applied the following merge fix > > > commit for today, please fix this in the tip tree. > > > > FWIW I got confirmation on Oct 23 that this had been committed to the > > tip tree. So I guess it just wasn't pushed yet. > > I merged the fix intoo the linux-next branch earlier today so it > should be resolved soon. Excellent, thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au