Hi Michael,

After merging the vhost tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allyesconfig)
failed like this:

In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h:53:0,
                 from arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm_para.h:81,
                 from arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_para.h:22,
                 from drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-kvm.c:18:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_para.h: In function 'kvm_arch_para_features':
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_para.h:58:40: error: 'KVM_HC_FEATURES' undeclared (first use in this function)
  if(epapr_hypercall0_1(KVM_HCALL_TOKEN(KVM_HC_FEATURES), &r))
                                        ^
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/epapr_hcalls.h:74:51: note: in definition of macro '_EV_HCALL_TOKEN'
 #define _EV_HCALL_TOKEN(id, num) (((id) << 16) | (num))
                                                   ^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_para.h:58:24: note: in expansion of macro 'KVM_HCALL_TOKEN'
  if(epapr_hypercall0_1(KVM_HCALL_TOKEN(KVM_HC_FEATURES), &r))
                        ^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_para.h:58:40: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
  if(epapr_hypercall0_1(KVM_HCALL_TOKEN(KVM_HC_FEATURES), &r))
                                        ^
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/epapr_hcalls.h:74:51: note: in definition of macro '_EV_HCALL_TOKEN'
 #define _EV_HCALL_TOKEN(id, num) (((id) << 16) | (num))
                                                   ^
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_para.h:58:24: note: in expansion of macro 'KVM_HCALL_TOKEN'
  if(epapr_hypercall0_1(KVM_HCALL_TOKEN(KVM_HC_FEATURES), &r))
                        ^
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-kvm.c: In function 'kvm_enter_idle':
drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-kvm.c:66:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_safe_halt' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  safe_halt();
  ^

Caused by commit 89bfc4cdb438 ("cpuidle: kvm cpuidle").

Given that the commit message for this commit includes "Very much a
demo for now, downstream only." it should *not* be in linux-next.  It
should especially not have turned up at this point (just before the
merge window).  I also wonder about some of the other commits in that
tree :-(

I have reverted that commit for today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au