From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:09:52 -0500
Message-ID: <20150205170952.525bdee6@gandalf.local.home>
References: <20150205005716.GS5370@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<CA+icZUWvBDC0FHX-OXLpjnSBbZceam_9KRBq4tcOM1jpJk0emQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150205015144.GT5370@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<CA+icZUUHBh-voBUfYEwajL7upnj3SJC47zJN-WnRW_7tnEnQsA@mail.gmail.com>
	<54D3186F.7030500@sr71.net>
	<20150205130343.6ac0eda9@gandalf.local.home>
	<20150205130802.289a8be0@gandalf.local.home>
	<54D3B253.3050000@sr71.net>
	<20150205183412.GI5370@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<54D3B7F5.9070209@sr71.net>
	<20150205184537.GJ5370@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<CA+icZUX_fi-O3kXymLCPfJ8Sx0yG=m5=pWzJDJpu-iHTyjM78Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150205145816.7c38a7df@gandalf.local.home>
	<CA+icZUUC7vD_FBUWV+WLBx2M-iXvR8E90zWGxmUWQcdmbHiH2A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150205152201.49d55905@gandalf.local.home>
	<CA+icZUV9SeWKrWN6Q8-Us-VpOgaz2sXX-RT2he4rwJmOzGQjOw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+icZUXkv2JV0kurGdvOPPavyrY2hb9rjTZ1yQn13gai=qobcw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtprelay0080.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.80]:56873 "EHLO
	smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751220AbbBEWJ4 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:09:56 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUXkv2JV0kurGdvOPPavyrY2hb9rjTZ1yQn13gai=qobcw@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>, linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>

On Thu, 5 Feb 2015 22:45:59 +0100
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:

> Steve, this was a typo it's called tlb_flush not tlb_flush*ed*:

Heh, yeah, I typed that entire line in by hand. Just be lucky that was
the only typo ;-)

> 
> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/tlb/tlb_flush/enable
> 1
> 
> [  391.090381] intel_pstate CPU 1 exiting
> [  391.104491] smpboot: CPU 1 is now offline
> 

Now, if you disable that (echo 0 to that file), do you still get the
rcu lockdep splat if you suspend and resume?

-- Steve