linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the workqueues tree
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 20:26:12 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150620202612.43818283@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2025 bytes --]

Hi Tejun,

After merging the workqueues tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:

kernel/workqueue.c: In function 'unbound_pwq_by_node':
kernel/workqueue.c:570:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'rcu_lockdep_assert' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex_or_pool_mutex(wq);
  ^
kernel/workqueue.c:570:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'lockdep_is_held' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Caused by commit:

  5b95e1af8d17 ("workqueue: wq_pool_mutex protects the attrs-installation")

from the workqueues tree interacting with commit:

  eeacf8982637 ("rcu: Rename rcu_lockdep_assert() to RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN()")

from the rcu tree.

I applied the followinf merge fix patch:

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 19:39:43 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: fix up for rcu_lockdep_assert() rename

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 837427cc5bdf..44cd4144ebcb 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -348,10 +348,10 @@ static void workqueue_sysfs_unregister(struct workqueue_struct *wq);
 			 "sched RCU or wq->mutex should be held")
 
 #define assert_rcu_or_wq_mutex_or_pool_mutex(wq)			\
-	rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_sched_held() ||		\
-			   lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex) ||		\
-			   lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex),		\
-			   "sched RCU, wq->mutex or wq_pool_mutex should be held")
+	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held() &&		\
+			 !lockdep_is_held(&wq->mutex) &&		\
+			 !lockdep_is_held(&wq_pool_mutex),		\
+			 "sched RCU, wq->mutex or wq_pool_mutex should be held")
 
 #define for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu)				\
 	for ((pool) = &per_cpu(cpu_worker_pools, cpu)[0];		\
-- 
2.1.4

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2015-06-20 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-20 10:26 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-11-02  3:34 linux-next: build failure after merge of the workqueues tree Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-03 13:59 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-18  3:57 Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-18  9:07 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-21  2:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-21  5:48   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-02-17  3:33 Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-17  9:23 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-09  4:12 Stephen Rothwell
2011-02-09  8:37 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150620202612.43818283@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).