From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the aio tree Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 07:41:24 +1100 Message-ID: <20160315074124.2b172e0e@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20160112164034.0fe945a7@canb.auug.org.au> <20160115073944.GA24382@infradead.org> <20160115202316.59601869@canb.auug.org.au> <20160115092531.GA3626@infradead.org> <20160115151821.GE6330@kvack.org> <20160116095515.4d8a2e52@canb.auug.org.au> <20160314154915.7d57cc32@canb.auug.org.au> <20160314170807.GJ17923@kvack.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:41631 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750741AbcCNUl1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 16:41:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160314170807.GJ17923@kvack.org> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Benjamin LaHaise Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King - ARM Linux , Al Viro Hi Ben, On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 13:08:07 -0400 Benjamin LaHaise wrote: > > I put in a patch to use get_user() for now since the 32 bit architectures > don't seem to have any plans for fixing this issue in a predictable > timeframe. There shouldn't be any build failures now -- I've checked ia64, > i386 and x86_64. The merge conflict looks trivial, so I won't touch > those pieces for the time being. OK, thanks for the heads up. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell