From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
james.morse@arm.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm64 tree with Linus' tree
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 09:49:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160429084928.GB32074@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160429095958.007976da@canb.auug.org.au>
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 09:59:58AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm64 tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 06a71a24bae5 ("arm64: KVM: unregister notifiers in hyp mode teardown path")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 67f691976662 ("arm64: kvm: allows kvm cpu hotplug")
>
> from the arm64 tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index dded1b763c16,1687e1450c3a..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@@ -1198,8 -1226,6 +1233,7 @@@ static void teardown_hyp_mode(void
> free_hyp_pgds();
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> free_page(per_cpu(kvm_arm_hyp_stack_page, cpu));
> - unregister_cpu_notifier(&hyp_init_cpu_nb);
> + hyp_cpu_pm_exit();
> }
>
> static int init_vhe_mode(void)
Thanks Stephen, this looks good to me.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-29 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-28 23:59 linux-next: manual merge of the arm64 tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-04-29 8:49 ` Will Deacon [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-01-24 21:36 Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-25 9:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-03-08 22:42 Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-09 12:20 ` Will Deacon
2022-03-08 22:38 Stephen Rothwell
2021-11-03 22:32 Stephen Rothwell
2021-11-05 9:34 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-28 22:29 Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-29 9:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-07-26 23:18 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-27 21:39 Stephen Rothwell
2019-10-28 8:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-24 23:31 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-10 21:52 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-11 10:16 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-12-06 22:18 Stephen Rothwell
2018-12-07 12:16 ` Will Deacon
2018-12-07 14:27 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2018-07-23 22:50 Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-24 9:29 ` Will Deacon
2018-01-16 22:30 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-16 22:25 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-14 21:32 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-14 21:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-01-11 21:23 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-12 12:25 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-10-31 20:57 Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-13 6:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-11-13 9:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-11-13 10:38 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-10-19 11:28 Mark Brown
2017-10-19 12:50 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-08-23 23:22 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-04 5:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-11-21 23:34 Stephen Rothwell
2016-11-22 13:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-09-11 23:17 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-05 1:27 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-11 0:14 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-21 23:15 Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-23 11:14 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-03-06 23:48 Stephen Rothwell
2015-10-31 23:53 Stephen Rothwell
2015-11-02 10:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-26 23:45 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-17 0:37 Stephen Rothwell
2012-12-05 23:17 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160429084928.GB32074@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).